FabDigitFabDigit

PA11 vs PA66

Polymer · grade comparison

PA11 and PA66 are both polymer grades, both engineering plastic. PA66 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for PA11, about 100% more; tensile strength follows at 82 MPa (11.9 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi). In exchange, PA11 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 40% for PA66, and PA66 is harder (81 Shore D vs 75 Shore D). PA11 is lighter (1.03 g/cm³ vs 1.14 g/cm³ for PA66) and PA66 is stiffer (3 GPa vs 1.6 GPa). On the shop floor, PA66 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PA11 (premium, $$$).

PA11Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PA66Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PA11 vs PA66: properties

PA11PA66

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.6 GPa0.23 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.55 GPa0.08 Msi
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

48 MPa7 ksi
82 MPa11.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

40 MPa5.8 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
40%

Compressive Strength

50 MPa7.3 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Flexural Strength

47 MPa6.8 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
2.9 GPa0.42 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in
50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

75 Shore D
81 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
120 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
5 GPa0.65 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Shear Strength

—
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
85 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.03 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.14 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

188°C370 °F
262°C504 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

46°C115 °F
70°C158 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
1.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.9%
8.5%

Refractive Index

—
1.53

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,800 J/kg·K0.43 BTU/lb·°F
1,670 J/kg·K0.4 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

120 µm/m·K66.7 µin/in·°F
85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

85°C185 °F
100°C212 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

180°C356 °F
220°C428 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

50°C122 °F
80°C176 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

160°C320 °F
200°C392 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

130°C266 °F
170°C338 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 25%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

23 kV/mm584 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
3.4

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.04
0.02

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
60 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Polishability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
1.5%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
290°C554 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
80°C176 °F

Formability (cold)

—
50 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

—
30 g/10 min

Same in both: Machinability 65 / 100 · Weldability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
6.7 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

40%
5%

Embodied Water

—
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

47 kN·m/kg
72 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.6 MN·m/kg
2.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

500 kJ/m³
1,067 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePA11PA66

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPA11PA66
3D printingYes—
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default conditionUnfilledUnfilled
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, UV Coating.

PA11 vs PA66 — frequently asked

Is PA66 stronger than PA11?

Yes. PA66 has a typical yield strength of 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for PA11 — about 100% more. Tensile strength is 82 MPa (11.9 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PA11 or PA66?

PA66 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PA11 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose PA11 over PA66?

Pick PA11 when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint. Pick PA66 when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PA11 and PA66 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.