FabDigitFabDigit

PA1010 vs PA6

Polymer · grade comparison

PA1010 and PA6 are both polymer grades. PA6 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PA1010, about 56% more; tensile strength follows at 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) vs 52 MPa (7.54 ksi). In exchange, PA1010 is the more ductile: elongation 180% versus 60% for PA6. PA1010 is lighter (1.05 g/cm³ vs 1.14 g/cm³ for PA6) and PA6 is stiffer (3 GPa vs 1.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PA1010 welds better (very good vs good) and PA6 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PA1010 (premium, $$$).

PA1010Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PA6Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

PA1010 vs PA6: properties

PA1010PA6

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.55 GPa0.08 Msi
1.1 GPa0.15 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

48 MPa7 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

180%
60%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Flexural Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Shear Strength

48 MPa7 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
81 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

110 HRR
119 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
5 GPa0.65 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
82 HRM

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.39 · Izod Impact, Notched 55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.05 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.14 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

205°C401 °F
220°C428 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

45°C113 °F
58°C136 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.4%
1.7%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2%
9%

Refractive Index

—
1.53

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.23 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F
90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

145°C293 °F
170°C338 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

52°C126 °F
65°C149 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

178°C352 °F
190°C374 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

140°C284 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 90°C194 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 24%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.4
3.7

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.025 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
68 / 100

Weldability

75 / 100
62 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.5%
1.2%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
260°C500 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
80°C176 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
15 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb
125 MJ/kg53,740 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
7.6 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

0%
5%

Embodied Water

—
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

50 kN·m/kg
70 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.4 MN·m/kg
2.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

768 kJ/m³
938 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePA6PA1010

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPA1010PA6
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$$ Premium$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

PA1010 vs PA6 — frequently asked

Is PA6 stronger than PA1010?

Yes. PA6 has a typical yield strength of 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PA1010 — about 56% more. Tensile strength is 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) vs 52 MPa (7.54 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PA1010 or PA6?

PA6 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PA1010 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, PA1010 or PA6?

PA1010. Its weldability rates very good (75/100) against good (62/100) for PA6.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PA1010 and PA6 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.