FabDigitFabDigit

MABS vs PC-ABS

Polymer · grade comparison

MABS and PC-ABS are both polymer grades. PC-ABS is the stronger of the two: yield strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for MABS, about 22% more; tensile strength follows at 56 MPa (8.12 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi). PC-ABS is the more ductile: elongation 90% versus 25% for MABS. MABS is lighter (1.08 g/cm³ vs 1.15 g/cm³ for PC-ABS) and PC-ABS is stiffer (2.4 GPa vs 2.2 GPa). On the shop floor, MABS welds better (82 vs 72 out of 100).

MABSChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when it will be welded.

PC-ABSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

MABS vs PC-ABS: properties

MABSPC-ABS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.8 GPa0.12 Msi
0.87 GPa0.13 Msi

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.38 Msi
4 GPa0.52 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.36
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

48 MPa7 ksi
56 MPa8.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
90%

Compressive Modulus

2.1 GPa0.3 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Flexural Strength

68 MPa9.9 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Shear Strength

35 MPa5.1 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.6 MPa·√m2.4 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

130 J/m2.4 ft·lbf/in
500 J/m9.4 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
79 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

65 HRM
68 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
115 HRR

Same in both: Compressive Strength 65 MPa9.4 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.08 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
125°C257 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.2%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.9%
0.6%

Refractive Index

1.538
—

Light Transmission

90%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.18 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

94°C201 °F
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

84°C183 °F
105°C221 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

98°C208 °F
135°C275 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
125°C257 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.012
0.008

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
250 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 25 kV/mm635 V/mil · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
78 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

68 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

82 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

72 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

88 / 100
65 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.5%
0.6%

Melt Flow Rate

9 g/10 min
14 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

240°C464 °F
265°C509 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
75°C167 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

96 MJ/kg41,273 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.1 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

0%
15%

Same in both: Embodied Water 200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

44 kN·m/kg
49 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2 MN·m/kg
2.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

460 kJ/m³
630 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePC-ABSMABS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMABSPC-ABS
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

MABS vs PC-ABS — frequently asked

Is PC-ABS stronger than MABS?

Yes. PC-ABS has a typical yield strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for MABS — about 22% more. Tensile strength is 56 MPa (8.12 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi).

Which is cheaper, MABS or PC-ABS?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, MABS or PC-ABS?

MABS. Its weldability rates very good (82/100) against very good (72/100) for PC-ABS.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in MABS and PC-ABS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.