FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs MABS

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and MABS are both polymer grades. MABS is the stronger of the two: yield strength 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for ABS, about 7% more; tensile strength follows at 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) vs 43 MPa (6.24 ksi). ABS is lighter (1.04 g/cm³ vs 1.08 g/cm³ for MABS). On the shop floor, ABS machines more easily (very good vs good), ABS forms better (82 vs 72 out of 100), and ABS sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than MABS (standard, $$).

ABSChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

MABSChoose it when strength drives the design.

ABS vs MABS: properties

ABSMABS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
2.2 GPa0.32 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
0.8 GPa0.12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
3 GPa0.38 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
68 MPa9.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
2.2 GPa0.32 Msi

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
2.6 MPa·√m2.4 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
130 J/m2.4 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
65 HRM

Same in both: Elongation at Break 25% · Compressive Strength 65 MPa9.4 ksi · Hardness, Shore D 78 Shore D · Hardness, Rockwell R 105 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.08 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
0.9%

Refractive Index

—
1.538

Light Transmission

—
90%

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) 105°C221 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.3%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.18 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
94°C201 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
84°C183 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
98°C208 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
19%

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 75°C167 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 95°C203 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
0.012

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.9 · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
62 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
68 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
82 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
72 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
88 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.5%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
9 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
240°C464 °F

Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 60°C140 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
96 MJ/kg41,273 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
4.1 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Same in both: Embodied Water 200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
44 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

383 kJ/m³
460 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABSMABS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSMABS
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

ABS vs MABS — frequently asked

Is MABS stronger than ABS?

Yes. MABS has a typical yield strength of 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for ABS — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) vs 43 MPa (6.24 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ABS or MABS?

ABS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while MABS is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ABS or MABS?

ABS. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (68/100) for MABS.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and MABS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.