FabDigitFabDigit

HIPS vs PC-ABS

Polymer · grade comparison

HIPS and PC-ABS are both polymer grades. PC-ABS is the stronger of the two: yield strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) for HIPS, about 129% more; tensile strength follows at 56 MPa (8.12 ksi) vs 26 MPa (3.77 ksi). PC-ABS is the more ductile: elongation 90% versus 40% for HIPS. HIPS is lighter (1.05 g/cm³ vs 1.15 g/cm³ for PC-ABS) and PC-ABS is stiffer (2.4 GPa vs 2 GPa). On the shop floor, HIPS sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PC-ABS (standard, $$).

HIPSChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when cost is the deciding factor.

PC-ABSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

HIPS vs PC-ABS: properties

HIPSPC-ABS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2 GPa0.29 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.74 GPa0.11 Msi
0.87 GPa0.13 Msi

Bulk Modulus

2 GPa0.35 Msi
4 GPa0.52 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

26 MPa3.8 ksi
56 MPa8.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

24 MPa3.5 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
90%

Compressive Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Flexural Strength

42 MPa6.1 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.9 GPa0.28 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

110 J/m2.1 ft·lbf/in
500 J/m9.4 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
79 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

100 HRR
115 HRR

Compressive Modulus

—
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Shear Strength

—
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
68 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.05 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

100°C212 °F
125°C257 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.07%
0.2%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.25%
0.6%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

65°C149 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

84°C183 °F
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

76°C169 °F
105°C221 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

97°C207 °F
135°C275 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

85°C185 °F
125°C257 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.5
3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.001
0.008

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
250 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
78 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

18 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

80 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

88 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

35 / 100
65 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.5%
0.6%

Melt Flow Rate

5 g/10 min
14 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

220°C428 °F
265°C509 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

40°C104 °F
75°C167 °F

Same in both: Machinability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

92 MJ/kg39,553 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.5 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

25 kN·m/kg
49 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
2.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

144 kJ/m³
630 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePC-ABSHIPS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHIPSPC-ABS
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

HIPS vs PC-ABS — frequently asked

Is PC-ABS stronger than HIPS?

Yes. PC-ABS has a typical yield strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) for HIPS — about 129% more. Tensile strength is 56 MPa (8.12 ksi) vs 26 MPa (3.77 ksi).

Which is cheaper, HIPS or PC-ABS?

HIPS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PC-ABS is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, HIPS or PC-ABS?

HIPS. Its weldability rates very good (80/100) against very good (72/100) for PC-ABS.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in HIPS and PC-ABS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.