FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs HIPS

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and HIPS are both polymer grades. ABS is the stronger of the two: yield strength 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) for HIPS, about 75% more; tensile strength follows at 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) vs 26 MPa (3.77 ksi). In exchange, HIPS is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 25% for ABS. ABS is stiffer (2.3 GPa vs 2 GPa) and ABS runs hotter in service (75°C vs 65°C continuous). On the shop floor, ABS machines more easily (very good vs good).

ABSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

HIPSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ABS vs HIPS: properties

ABSHIPS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
0.74 GPa0.11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
2 GPa0.35 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
26 MPa3.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
24 MPa3.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
40%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
42 MPa6.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
1.9 GPa0.28 Msi

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
110 J/m2.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
100 HRR

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.35 · Hardness, Shore D 78 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.05 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
100°C212 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.07%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
0.25%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
65°C149 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
84°C183 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
76°C169 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
97°C207 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
85°C185 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
2.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
0.001

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Same in both: Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
72 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
18 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
35 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.5%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
5 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
220°C428 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
40°C104 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
92 MJ/kg39,553 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
3.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
25 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
1.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

383 kJ/m³
144 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABSHIPS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSHIPS
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

ABS vs HIPS — frequently asked

Is ABS stronger than HIPS?

Yes. ABS has a typical yield strength of 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) for HIPS — about 75% more. Tensile strength is 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) vs 26 MPa (3.77 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ABS or HIPS?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, ABS or HIPS?

ABS. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (65/100) for HIPS.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and HIPS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.