FabDigitFabDigit

HDPE vs VLDPE

Polymer · grade comparison

HDPE and VLDPE are both polymer grades. HDPE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) against 6 MPa (0.87 ksi) for VLDPE, about 4.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) vs 16 MPa (2.32 ksi). In exchange, VLDPE is the more ductile: elongation 750% versus 600% for HDPE, and HDPE is harder (65 Shore D vs 38 Shore D). VLDPE is lighter (0.9 g/cm³ vs 0.96 g/cm³ for HDPE) and HDPE is stiffer (1.1 GPa vs 0.06 GPa). On the shop floor, HDPE machines more easily (very good vs poor).

HDPEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

VLDPEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

HDPE vs VLDPE: properties

HDPEVLDPE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
0.06 GPa0.01 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.4 GPa0.06 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.46

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

28 MPa4.1 ksi
16 MPa2.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

26 MPa3.8 ksi
6 MPa0.87 ksi

Elongation at Break

600%
750%

Compressive Strength

22 MPa3.2 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

0.9 GPa0.13 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

27 MPa3.9 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
0.06 GPa0.01 Msi

Shear Strength

20 MPa2.9 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in
900 J/m16.9 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

65 Shore D
38 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

55 HRR
—

Hardness, Shore A

—
88 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
80 kN/m457 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
60%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.96 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.9 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

132°C270 °F
112°C234 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-110°C-166 °F
-125°C-193 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.05%
0.02%

Refractive Index

1.54
1.5

Light Transmission

—
88%

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.48 W/m·K0.28 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.33 W/m·K0.19 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
2,300 J/kg·K0.55 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F
220 µm/m·K122 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
60°C140 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

76°C169 °F
45°C113 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

47°C117 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

76°C169 °F
72°C162 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

110°C230 °F
85°C185 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -80°C-112 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 18%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.35
2.25

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 3×10⁻⁴ · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 90 / 100 · UV / Weathering Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
2.2%

Melt Flow Rate

8 g/10 min
1 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

230°C446 °F
190°C374 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

40°C104 °F
30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb
100 L/kg12 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
0%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

29 kN·m/kg
18 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.2 MN·m/kg
0.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

307 kJ/m³
300 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.3 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleHDPEVLDPE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHDPEVLDPE
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionFDA Compliant—
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

HDPE vs VLDPE — frequently asked

Is HDPE stronger than VLDPE?

Yes. HDPE has a typical yield strength of 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) against 6 MPa (0.87 ksi) for VLDPE — about 4.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) vs 16 MPa (2.32 ksi).

Which is cheaper, HDPE or VLDPE?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, HDPE or VLDPE?

HDPE. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against poor (25/100) for VLDPE.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in HDPE and VLDPE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.