FabDigitFabDigit

HDPE vs PP

Polymer · grade comparison

HDPE and PP are both polymer grades, both corrosion resistant plastic. PP is the stronger of the two: yield strength 33 MPa (4.79 ksi) against 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) for HDPE, about 27% more; tensile strength follows at 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) vs 28 MPa (4.06 ksi). In exchange, HDPE is the more ductile: elongation 600% versus 150% for PP, and PP is harder (72 Shore D vs 65 Shore D). PP is lighter (0.91 g/cm³ vs 0.96 g/cm³ for HDPE) and PP is stiffer (1.5 GPa vs 1.1 GPa). On the shop floor, HDPE machines more easily (very good vs good).

HDPEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

PPChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

HDPE vs PP: properties

HDPEPP

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.4 GPa0.06 Msi
0.55 GPa0.08 Msi

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
3 GPa0.45 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.42

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

28 MPa4.1 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

26 MPa3.8 ksi
33 MPa4.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

600%
150%

Compressive Strength

22 MPa3.2 ksi
42 MPa6.1 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.9 GPa0.13 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Flexural Strength

27 MPa3.9 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Shear Strength

20 MPa2.9 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in
30 J/m0.56 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

65 Shore D
72 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

55 HRR
95 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.96 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.91 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

132°C270 °F
165°C329 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-110°C-166 °F
-10°C14 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.02%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.05%
0.1%

Refractive Index

1.54
1.49

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.48 W/m·K0.28 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F
110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-80°C-112 °F
-10°C14 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

76°C169 °F
105°C221 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

47°C117 °F
60°C140 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

76°C169 °F
90°C194 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

110°C230 °F
130°C266 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F · Limiting Oxygen Index 18%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.35
2.25

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 3×10⁻⁴ · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
20 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
40 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
1.6%

Melt Flow Rate

8 g/10 min
12 g/10 min

Same in both: Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 230°C446 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 40°C104 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb
100 L/kg12 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
5%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

29 kN·m/kg
39 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.2 MN·m/kg
1.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

307 kJ/m³
363 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.3 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleHDPEPP

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHDPEPP
3D printing—Yes
Default conditionFDA CompliantHomopolymer
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. They share 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

HDPE vs PP — frequently asked

Is PP stronger than HDPE?

Yes. PP has a typical yield strength of 33 MPa (4.79 ksi) against 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) for HDPE — about 27% more. Tensile strength is 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) vs 28 MPa (4.06 ksi).

Which is cheaper, HDPE or PP?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, HDPE or PP?

HDPE. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (60/100) for PP.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in HDPE and PP side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.