FabDigitFabDigit

CPVC vs HDPE

Polymer · grade comparison

CPVC and HDPE are both polymer grades, both corrosion resistant plastic. CPVC is the stronger of the two: yield strength 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) against 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) for HDPE, about 100% more; tensile strength follows at 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 28 MPa (4.06 ksi). In exchange, HDPE is the more ductile: elongation 600% versus 25% for CPVC, and CPVC is harder (82 Shore D vs 65 Shore D). HDPE is lighter (0.96 g/cm³ vs 1.54 g/cm³ for CPVC) and CPVC is stiffer (3 GPa vs 1.1 GPa). On the shop floor, HDPE welds better (excellent vs good) and HDPE sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than CPVC (standard, $$).

CPVCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

HDPEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

CPVC vs HDPE: properties

CPVCHDPE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
0.4 GPa0.06 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.44

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
28 MPa4.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
26 MPa3.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
600%

Compressive Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.7 GPa0.39 Msi
0.9 GPa0.13 Msi

Flexural Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
27 MPa3.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
65 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
55 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in

Same in both: Izod Impact, Notched 90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.54 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
0.96 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

115°C239 °F
-110°C-166 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.04%
0.01%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.25%
0.05%

Refractive Index

1.55
1.54

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
132°C270 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.14 W/m·K0.08 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.48 W/m·K0.28 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

950 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F
150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

93°C199 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

0°C32 °F
-80°C-112 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

118°C244 °F
76°C169 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

103°C217 °F
47°C117 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

115°C239 °F
76°C169 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

60%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

105°C221 °F
110°C230 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
24 kV/mm610 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.4
2.35

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.014
3×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

65 / 100
95 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.5%
2%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
230°C446 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

55°C131 °F
40°C104 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
8 g/10 min

Same in both: Machinability 75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

36 kN·m/kg
29 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
1.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

451 kJ/m³
307 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleHDPECPVC

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCPVCHDPE
Default conditionUnfilledFDA Compliant
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

CPVC vs HDPE — frequently asked

Is CPVC stronger than HDPE?

Yes. CPVC has a typical yield strength of 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) against 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) for HDPE — about 100% more. Tensile strength is 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 28 MPa (4.06 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CPVC or HDPE?

HDPE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while CPVC is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, CPVC or HDPE?

HDPE. Its weldability rates excellent (95/100) against good (65/100) for CPVC.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CPVC and HDPE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.