FabDigitFabDigit

CPE vs HDPE

Polymer · grade comparison

CPE and HDPE are both polymer grades. HDPE is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) against 8 MPa (1.16 ksi) for CPE, about 3.5 times as much. In exchange, CPE is the more ductile: elongation 700% versus 600% for HDPE, and HDPE is harder (65 Shore D vs 18 Shore D). HDPE is lighter (0.96 g/cm³ vs 1.16 g/cm³ for CPE) and HDPE is stiffer (1.1 GPa vs 0.02 GPa). On the shop floor, HDPE machines more easily (very good vs poor) and HDPE welds better (excellent vs very good).

CPEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

HDPEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

CPE vs HDPE: properties

CPEHDPE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.02 GPa0 Msi
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.47
0.44

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

8 MPa1.2 ksi
28 MPa4.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

700%
600%

Hardness, Shore A

65 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

18 Shore D
65 Shore D

Tear Strength

28 kN/m160 lbf/in
—

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

38%
—

Shear Modulus

—
0.4 GPa0.06 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
26 MPa3.8 ksi

Compressive Strength

—
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

—
0.9 GPa0.13 Msi

Flexural Strength

—
27 MPa3.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

—
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Shear Strength

—
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

—
90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
55 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.16 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
0.96 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

-20°C-4 °F
-110°C-166 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.1%
0.01%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
132°C270 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
0.05%

Refractive Index

—
1.54

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.48 W/m·K0.28 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,800 J/kg·K0.43 BTU/lb·°F
1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F
150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-80°C-112 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

26%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

150°C302 °F
110°C230 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

—
76°C169 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
47°C117 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
76°C169 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
24 kV/mm610 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

5
2.35

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.04
3×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

88 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
75 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
95 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.9%
2%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

175°C347 °F
230°C446 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

170°C338 °F
40°C104 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
8 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.8 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

0%
10%

Embodied Water

—
90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

7 kN·m/kg
29 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0 MN·m/kg
1.2 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleHDPE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCPEHDPE
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—FDA Compliant
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

CPE vs HDPE — frequently asked

Is HDPE stronger than CPE?

Yes. HDPE has a typical tensile strength of 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) against 8 MPa (1.16 ksi) for CPE — about 3.5 times as much.

Which is cheaper, CPE or HDPE?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CPE or HDPE?

HDPE. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against poor (25/100) for CPE; for welding the order is HDPE first (excellent, 95/100) then CPE (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CPE and HDPE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.