FabDigitFabDigit

HDPE vs UHMW-PE

Polymer · grade comparison

HDPE and UHMW-PE are both polymer grades. HDPE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) against 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) for UHMW-PE, about 24% more. HDPE is the more ductile: elongation 600% versus 350% for UHMW-PE. HDPE is stiffer (1.1 GPa vs 0.72 GPa) and HDPE conducts heat better (0.48 W/m·K vs 0.41 W/m·K). On the shop floor, HDPE welds better (excellent vs poor) and HDPE sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than UHMW-PE (standard, $$).

HDPEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

HDPE vs UHMW-PE: properties

HDPEUHMW-PE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
0.72 GPa0.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.4 GPa0.06 Msi
0.25 GPa0.04 Msi

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.46

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

28 MPa4.1 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

26 MPa3.8 ksi
21 MPa3 ksi

Elongation at Break

600%
350%

Compressive Strength

22 MPa3.2 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.9 GPa0.13 Msi
0.6 GPa0.09 Msi

Flexural Strength

27 MPa3.9 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
0.75 GPa0.11 Msi

Shear Strength

20 MPa2.9 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in
1,300 J/m24.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

65 Shore D
64 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

55 HRR
50 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.96 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

132°C270 °F
135°C275 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-110°C-166 °F
-120°C-184 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.05%
0.01%

Refractive Index

1.54
1.51

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.48 W/m·K0.28 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.41 W/m·K0.24 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
1,840 J/kg·K0.44 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F
200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-80°C-112 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

76°C169 °F
80°C176 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

47°C117 °F
44°C111 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

76°C169 °F
80°C176 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
17%

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 80°C176 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 110°C230 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.35
2.3

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 3×10⁻⁴ · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 90 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

95 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
3%

Melt Flow Rate

8 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

230°C446 °F
200°C392 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

40°C104 °F
—

Same in both: Machinability 75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb
100 L/kg12 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

29 kN·m/kg
43 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.2 MN·m/kg
0.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

307 kJ/m³
306 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.3 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleHDPEUHMW-PE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHDPEUHMW-PE
Default conditionFDA CompliantFDA
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

HDPE vs UHMW-PE — frequently asked

Is HDPE stronger than UHMW-PE?

Yes. HDPE has a typical yield strength of 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) against 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) for UHMW-PE — about 24% more. Tensile strength is 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) vs 40 MPa (5.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, HDPE or UHMW-PE?

HDPE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while UHMW-PE is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, HDPE or UHMW-PE?

HDPE. Its weldability rates excellent (95/100) against poor (15/100) for UHMW-PE.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in HDPE and UHMW-PE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.