FabDigitFabDigit

PU Cast vs UHMW-PE

Polymer · grade comparison

PU Cast and UHMW-PE are both polymer grades, both wear resistant plastic. UHMW-PE is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for PU Cast, about 3.3 times as much. In exchange, PU Cast is the more ductile: elongation 700% versus 350% for UHMW-PE, and UHMW-PE is harder (64 Shore D vs 10 Shore D). UHMW-PE is lighter (0.94 g/cm³ vs 1.1 g/cm³ for PU Cast) and UHMW-PE is stiffer (0.72 GPa vs 0 GPa). On the shop floor, UHMW-PE machines more easily (very good vs poor).

PU CastChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

UHMW-PEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

PU Cast vs UHMW-PE: properties

PU CastUHMW-PE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0 GPa2.9×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.72 GPa0.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

7×10⁻⁴ GPa1.02×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.25 GPa0.04 Msi

Bulk Modulus

2 GPa0.29 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.49
0.46

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

12 MPa1.7 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

700%
350%

Compressive Strength

1 MPa0.15 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Shear Strength

5 MPa0.73 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Hardness, Shore A

40 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

10 Shore D
64 Shore D

Tear Strength

20 kN/m114 lbf/in
—

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

15%
—

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
21 MPa3 ksi

Compressive Modulus

—
0.6 GPa0.09 Msi

Flexural Strength

—
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

—
0.75 GPa0.11 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

—
1,300 J/m24.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
50 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.1 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

-50°C-58 °F
-120°C-184 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.5%
0.01%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.5%
0.01%

Refractive Index

1.5
1.51

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
135°C275 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.18 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.41 W/m·K0.24 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,800 J/kg·K0.43 BTU/lb·°F
1,840 J/kg·K0.44 BTU/lb·°F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

21%
17%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

120°C248 °F
110°C230 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

—
80°C176 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
44°C111 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
80°C176 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 80°C176 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

5
2.3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.05
3×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.5%
3%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

80°C176 °F
200°C392 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

100°C212 °F
—

Same in both: Weldability 15 / 100 · Polishability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

102 MJ/kg43,852 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb
100 L/kg12 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

11 kN·m/kg
43 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0 MN·m/kg
0.8 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleUHMW-PEPU Cast

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPU CastUHMW-PE
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default conditionShore A 40FDA
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Painting—Yes

Both are offered for Injection molding. They share 5 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PU Cast vs UHMW-PE — frequently asked

Is UHMW-PE stronger than PU Cast?

Yes. UHMW-PE has a typical tensile strength of 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for PU Cast — about 3.3 times as much.

Which is cheaper, PU Cast or UHMW-PE?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PU Cast or UHMW-PE?

UHMW-PE. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against poor (25/100) for PU Cast.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PU Cast and UHMW-PE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.