FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs PP

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and PP are both polymer grades. ABS is the stronger of the two: yield strength 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 33 MPa (4.79 ksi) for PP, about 27% more; tensile strength follows at 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) vs 35 MPa (5.08 ksi). In exchange, PP is the more ductile: elongation 150% versus 25% for ABS, and ABS is harder (78 Shore D vs 72 Shore D). PP is lighter (0.91 g/cm³ vs 1.04 g/cm³ for ABS) and ABS is stiffer (2.3 GPa vs 1.5 GPa). On the shop floor, ABS machines more easily (very good vs good) and PP welds better (excellent vs very good).

ABSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

PPChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

ABS vs PP: properties

ABSPP

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
0.55 GPa0.08 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
3 GPa0.45 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.42

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
33 MPa4.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
150%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
42 MPa6.1 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
30 J/m0.56 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
72 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
95 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
0.91 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
-10°C14 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.02%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
0.1%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
165°C329 °F

Refractive Index

—
1.49

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-10°C14 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
105°C221 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
60°C140 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
90°C194 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
130°C266 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
2.25

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
3×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Same in both: Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
20 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
40 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
1.6%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
12 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
230°C446 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
40°C104 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
100 L/kg12 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
39 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
1.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

383 kJ/m³
363 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABSPP

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSPP
Default conditionUnfilledHomopolymer
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal, Injection molding and 3D printing. Both take the same 12 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), Conductive Coating, Dyeing (Nylon), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Primer Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, Tinted Coating, UV Coating, Vacuum Metallization, Waterproof Coating.

ABS vs PP — frequently asked

Is ABS stronger than PP?

Yes. ABS has a typical yield strength of 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 33 MPa (4.79 ksi) for PP — about 27% more. Tensile strength is 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) vs 35 MPa (5.08 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ABS or PP?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, ABS or PP?

ABS. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (60/100) for PP; for welding the order is PP first (excellent, 92/100) then ABS (very good, 78/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and PP side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.