FabDigitFabDigit

HDPE vs PEX

Polymer · grade comparison

HDPE and PEX are both polymer grades. HDPE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) against 17 MPa (2.47 ksi) for PEX, about 53% more; tensile strength follows at 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi). HDPE is the more ductile: elongation 600% versus 500% for PEX, and HDPE is harder (65 Shore D vs 60 Shore D). HDPE is stiffer (1.1 GPa vs 0.68 GPa) and PEX runs hotter in service (95°C vs 80°C continuous). On the shop floor, HDPE machines more easily (very good vs fair), HDPE welds better (excellent vs not recommended), and HDPE sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PEX (standard, $$).

HDPEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PEXChoose it when the part sees heat.

HDPE vs PEX: properties

HDPEPEX

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
0.68 GPa0.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.4 GPa0.06 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.45

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

28 MPa4.1 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

26 MPa3.8 ksi
17 MPa2.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

600%
500%

Compressive Strength

22 MPa3.2 ksi
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.9 GPa0.13 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

27 MPa3.9 ksi
17 MPa2.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
0.63 GPa0.09 Msi

Shear Strength

20 MPa2.9 ksi
14 MPa2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in
300 J/m5.6 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

65 Shore D
60 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

55 HRR
42 HRR

Hardness, Shore A

—
95 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
95 kN/m542 lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.96 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

-110°C-166 °F
-120°C-184 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.05%
0.03%

Refractive Index

1.54
—

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 132°C270 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.48 W/m·K0.28 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.38 W/m·K0.22 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
2,300 J/kg·K0.55 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F
170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
95°C203 °F

Min Service Temperature

-80°C-112 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

76°C169 °F
70°C158 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

47°C117 °F
42°C108 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

76°C169 °F
98°C208 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 18% · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 110°C230 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.35
2.3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

3×10⁻⁴
4×10⁻⁴

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
42 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
2.5%

Melt Flow Rate

8 g/10 min
1 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

230°C446 °F
215°C419 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

40°C104 °F
60°C140 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
82 MJ/kg35,254 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
2.3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb
120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

29 kN·m/kg
23 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.2 MN·m/kg
0.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

307 kJ/m³
213 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.3 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleHDPEPEX

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHDPEPEX
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionFDA Compliant—
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

HDPE vs PEX — frequently asked

Is HDPE stronger than PEX?

Yes. HDPE has a typical yield strength of 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) against 17 MPa (2.47 ksi) for PEX — about 53% more. Tensile strength is 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi).

Which is cheaper, HDPE or PEX?

HDPE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PEX is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, HDPE or PEX?

HDPE. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against fair (42/100) for PEX; for welding the order is HDPE first (excellent, 95/100) then PEX (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in HDPE and PEX side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.