FabDigitFabDigit

HDPE vs PE-RT

Polymer · grade comparison

HDPE and PE-RT are both polymer grades. HDPE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for PE-RT, about 44% more; tensile strength follows at 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) vs 24 MPa (3.48 ksi). In exchange, PE-RT is the more ductile: elongation 750% versus 600% for HDPE, and HDPE is harder (65 Shore D vs 56 Shore D). HDPE is stiffer (1.1 GPa vs 0.8 GPa) and HDPE runs hotter in service (80°C vs 70°C continuous). On the shop floor, HDPE machines more easily (very good vs good) and HDPE sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PE-RT (standard, $$).

HDPEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PE-RTChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

HDPE vs PE-RT: properties

HDPEPE-RT

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
0.8 GPa0.12 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.4 GPa0.06 Msi
0.28 GPa0.04 Msi

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
3 GPa0.38 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.45

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

28 MPa4.1 ksi
24 MPa3.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

26 MPa3.8 ksi
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

600%
750%

Compressive Strength

22 MPa3.2 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.9 GPa0.13 Msi
0.75 GPa0.11 Msi

Flexural Strength

27 MPa3.9 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
0.7 GPa0.1 Msi

Shear Strength

20 MPa2.9 ksi
16 MPa2.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in
250 J/m4.7 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

65 Shore D
56 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

55 HRR
40 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.96 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

132°C270 °F
124°C255 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.05%
0.03%

Refractive Index

1.54
—

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) -110°C-166 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.48 W/m·K0.28 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.4 W/m·K0.23 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F
180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
70°C158 °F

Min Service Temperature

-80°C-112 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

76°C169 °F
68°C154 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

47°C117 °F
45°C113 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

76°C169 °F
118°C244 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

110°C230 °F
95°C203 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F · Limiting Oxygen Index 18%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.35
2.3

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 3×10⁻⁴ · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
96 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
92 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

8 g/10 min
0.9 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

230°C446 °F
215°C419 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

40°C104 °F
30°C86 °F

Same in both: Polishability 30 / 100 · Mold Shrinkage 2%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
2.1 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb
80 L/kg9.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

29 kN·m/kg
26 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.2 MN·m/kg
0.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

307 kJ/m³
203 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.3 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleHDPEPE-RT

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHDPEPE-RT
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionFDA Compliant—
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

HDPE vs PE-RT — frequently asked

Is HDPE stronger than PE-RT?

Yes. HDPE has a typical yield strength of 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for PE-RT — about 44% more. Tensile strength is 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) vs 24 MPa (3.48 ksi).

Which is cheaper, HDPE or PE-RT?

HDPE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PE-RT is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, HDPE or PE-RT?

HDPE. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (55/100) for PE-RT.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in HDPE and PE-RT side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.