FabDigitFabDigit

HDPE vs mLLDPE

Polymer · grade comparison

HDPE and mLLDPE are both polymer grades. HDPE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for mLLDPE, about 160% more. In exchange, mLLDPE is the more ductile: elongation 750% versus 600% for HDPE, and HDPE is harder (65 Shore D vs 48 Shore D). MLLDPE is lighter (0.92 g/cm³ vs 0.96 g/cm³ for HDPE) and HDPE is stiffer (1.1 GPa vs 0.25 GPa). On the shop floor, HDPE machines more easily (very good vs fair) and HDPE sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than mLLDPE (standard, $$).

HDPEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

mLLDPEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

HDPE vs mLLDPE: properties

HDPEmLLDPE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
0.25 GPa0.04 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.4 GPa0.06 Msi
0.09 GPa0.01 Msi

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
2 GPa0.26 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.45

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

28 MPa4.1 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

26 MPa3.8 ksi
10 MPa1.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

600%
750%

Compressive Strength

22 MPa3.2 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

0.9 GPa0.13 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

27 MPa3.9 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
0.28 GPa0.04 Msi

Shear Strength

20 MPa2.9 ksi
—

Izod Impact, Notched

90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in
850 J/m15.9 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

65 Shore D
48 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

55 HRR
—

Hardness, Shore A

—
92 Shore A

Same in both: Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.96 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.92 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

132°C270 °F
120°C248 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-110°C-166 °F
-120°C-184 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.05%
0.02%

Refractive Index

1.54
1.51

Light Transmission

—
90%

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.48 W/m·K0.28 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.33 W/m·K0.19 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
2,100 J/kg·K0.5 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F
180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
75°C167 °F

Min Service Temperature

-80°C-112 °F
-70°C-94 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

76°C169 °F
55°C131 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

47°C117 °F
35°C95 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

76°C169 °F
98°C208 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

110°C230 °F
95°C203 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 18%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
28 kV/mm711 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.35
2.3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

3×10⁻⁴
2×10⁻⁴

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
50 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
92 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

8 g/10 min
1 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

230°C446 °F
205°C401 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

40°C104 °F
25°C77 °F

Same in both: Polishability 30 / 100 · Mold Shrinkage 2%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb
100 L/kg12 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
0%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

29 kN·m/kg
33 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.2 MN·m/kg
0.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

307 kJ/m³
200 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.3 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleHDPEmLLDPE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHDPEmLLDPE
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionFDA Compliant—
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

HDPE vs mLLDPE — frequently asked

Is HDPE stronger than mLLDPE?

Yes. HDPE has a typical yield strength of 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for mLLDPE — about 160% more. Tensile strength is 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi).

Which is cheaper, HDPE or mLLDPE?

HDPE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while mLLDPE is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, HDPE or mLLDPE?

HDPE. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against fair (50/100) for mLLDPE; for welding the order is HDPE first (excellent, 95/100) then mLLDPE (excellent, 90/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in HDPE and mLLDPE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.