FabDigitFabDigit

ETFE vs PVDF

Polymer · grade comparison

ETFE and PVDF are both polymer grades. PVDF is the stronger of the two: yield strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 22 MPa (3.19 ksi) for ETFE, about 127% more; tensile strength follows at 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 45 MPa (6.53 ksi). In exchange, ETFE is the more ductile: elongation 320% versus 60% for PVDF, and PVDF is harder (78 Shore D vs 73 Shore D). PVDF is stiffer (2.1 GPa vs 0.85 GPa) and ETFE conducts heat better (0.24 W/m·K vs 0.19 W/m·K). On the shop floor, PVDF machines more easily (very good vs good).

ETFEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PVDFChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

ETFE vs PVDF: properties

ETFEPVDF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.43
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

22 MPa3.2 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

320%
60%

Compressive Strength

32 MPa4.6 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

1,000 J/m18.7 ft·lbf/in
160 J/m3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

73 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

50 HRR
110 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.8 GPa0.12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.52 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Flexural Strength

—
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Shear Strength

—
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
75 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.73 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.78 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

265°C509 °F
172°C342 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.03%
0.04%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
0.06%

Refractive Index

1.403
1.42

Light Transmission

92%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.24 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

95 µm/m·K52.8 µin/in·°F
130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-190°C-310 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

104°C219 °F
140°C284 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

74°C165 °F
88°C190 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

175°C347 °F
145°C293 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

31%
44%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

200°C392 °F
165°C329 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
2×10¹² Ω·m7.87×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.6
6.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.006
0.17

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
2×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

98 / 100
96 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
75 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

3.5%
2.5%

Melt Flow Rate

8 g/10 min
10 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

320°C608 °F
230°C446 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

120°C248 °F
80°C176 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

230 MJ/kg98,882 BTU/lb
145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

14 kg CO₂/kg
8.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
28 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.5 MN·m/kg
1.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

285 kJ/m³
595 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePVDFETFE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityETFEPVDF
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

ETFE vs PVDF — frequently asked

Is PVDF stronger than ETFE?

Yes. PVDF has a typical yield strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 22 MPa (3.19 ksi) for ETFE — about 127% more. Tensile strength is 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 45 MPa (6.53 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ETFE or PVDF?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, ETFE or PVDF?

PVDF. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (62/100) for ETFE; for welding the order is PVDF first (excellent, 88/100) then ETFE (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ETFE and PVDF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.