FabDigitFabDigit

ETFE vs FEP

Polymer · grade comparison

ETFE and FEP are both polymer grades. ETFE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 22 MPa (3.19 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for FEP, about 69% more; tensile strength follows at 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi). ETFE is harder — 73 Shore D against 56 Shore D for FEP — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. ETFE is lighter (1.73 g/cm³ vs 2.15 g/cm³ for FEP) and ETFE is stiffer (0.85 GPa vs 0.48 GPa). On the shop floor, ETFE sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than FEP (specialty, $$$$$).

ETFEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

FEPChoose it when the part sees heat.

ETFE vs FEP: properties

ETFEFEP

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
0.48 GPa0.07 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.43
0.45

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
23 MPa3.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

22 MPa3.2 ksi
13 MPa1.9 ksi

Compressive Strength

32 MPa4.6 ksi
16 MPa2.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
0.6 GPa0.09 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

1,000 J/m18.7 ft·lbf/in
2,700 J/m50.6 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

73 Shore D
56 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

50 HRR
25 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.18 GPa0.03 Msi

Same in both: Elongation at Break 320%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.73 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
2.15 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

265°C509 °F
260°C500 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
-90°C-130 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.03%
0.01%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
0.01%

Refractive Index

1.403
1.344

Light Transmission

92%
95%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.24 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
1,170 J/kg·K0.28 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

95 µm/m·K52.8 µin/in·°F
100 µm/m·K55.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-190°C-310 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

104°C219 °F
70°C158 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

74°C165 °F
51°C124 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

175°C347 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

31%
95%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

200°C392 °F
230°C446 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
24 kV/mm610 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.6
2.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.006
6×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm

Same in both: Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
98 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 98 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

3.5%
4%

Melt Flow Rate

8 g/10 min
7 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

320°C608 °F
350°C662 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

120°C248 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Weldability 80 / 100 · Formability (cold) 75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

230 MJ/kg98,882 BTU/lb
220 MJ/kg94,583 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

14 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
11 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.5 MN·m/kg
0.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

285 kJ/m³
176 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleFEPETFE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityETFEFEP
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

ETFE vs FEP — frequently asked

Is ETFE stronger than FEP?

Yes. ETFE has a typical yield strength of 22 MPa (3.19 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for FEP — about 69% more. Tensile strength is 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ETFE or FEP?

ETFE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while FEP is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ETFE or FEP?

ETFE, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 62/100 against 55/100 for FEP.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ETFE and FEP side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.