FabDigitFabDigit

EPE vs HDPE

Polymer · grade comparison

EPE and HDPE are both polymer grades. HDPE is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) against 0.25 MPa (0.0363 ksi) for EPE, about 112 times as much. HDPE is the more ductile: elongation 600% versus 90% for EPE. EPE is lighter (0.03 g/cm³ vs 0.96 g/cm³ for HDPE) and HDPE is stiffer (1.1 GPa vs 0 GPa). On the shop floor, EPE machines more easily (excellent vs very good), HDPE welds better (excellent vs very good), and HDPE sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than EPE (standard, $$).

EPEChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

HDPEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

EPE vs HDPE: properties

EPEHDPE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0 GPa2.9×10⁻⁴ Msi
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.2
0.44

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.25 MPa0.04 ksi
28 MPa4.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

90%
600%

Compressive Strength

0.05 MPa0.01 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0 GPa2.18×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.9 GPa0.13 Msi

Tear Strength

0.6 kN/m3.4 lbf/in
—

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

20%
—

Shear Modulus

—
0.4 GPa0.06 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
26 MPa3.8 ksi

Flexural Strength

—
27 MPa3.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

—
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Shear Strength

—
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

—
90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

—
65 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
55 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.03 g/cm³9.03×10⁻⁴ lb/in³
0.96 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

110°C230 °F
132°C270 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.5%
0.01%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
0.05%

Refractive Index

—
1.54

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) -110°C-166 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.48 W/m·K0.28 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,300 J/kg·K0.55 BTU/lb·°F
1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F
150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-80°C-112 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
110°C230 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

—
76°C169 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
47°C117 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
76°C169 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 18%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

2.5 kV/mm63.5 V/mil
24 kV/mm610 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.06
2.35

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 3×10⁻⁴ · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 90 / 100 · UV / Weathering Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
75 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
95 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
70 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

2 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

160°C320 °F
230°C446 °F

Polishability

—
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
2%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
40°C104 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.8 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

10 kN·m/kg
29 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.1 MN·m/kg
1.2 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.7 mm²/s
0.3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleHDPE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEPEHDPE
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—FDA Compliant
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

EPE vs HDPE — frequently asked

Is HDPE stronger than EPE?

Yes. HDPE has a typical tensile strength of 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) against 0.25 MPa (0.0363 ksi) for EPE — about 112 times as much.

Which is cheaper, EPE or HDPE?

HDPE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while EPE is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, EPE or HDPE?

EPE. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (75/100) for HDPE; for welding the order is HDPE first (excellent, 95/100) then EPE (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EPE and HDPE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.