FabDigitFabDigit

EEA vs Ionomer

Polymer · grade comparison

EEA and Ionomer are both polymer grades. Ionomer is the stronger of the two: yield strength 15 MPa (2.18 ksi) against 5 MPa (0.725 ksi) for EEA, about 3.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 12 MPa (1.74 ksi). In exchange, EEA is the more ductile: elongation 700% versus 380% for Ionomer, and Ionomer is harder (60 Shore D vs 32 Shore D). Ionomer is stiffer (0.28 GPa vs 0.05 GPa) and EEA conducts heat better (0.3 W/m·K vs 0.24 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Ionomer machines more easily (30 vs 15 out of 100) and EEA sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Ionomer (premium, $$$).

EEAChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

IonomerChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

EEA vs Ionomer: properties

EEAIonomer

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.05 GPa0.01 Msi
0.28 GPa0.04 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.46
0.44

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

12 MPa1.7 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

5 MPa0.73 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

700%
380%

Flexural Modulus

0.03 GPa0 Msi
0.26 GPa0.04 Msi

Hardness, Shore A

88 Shore A
94 Shore A

Hardness, Shore D

32 Shore D
60 Shore D

Tear Strength

60 kN/m343 lbf/in
—

Shear Modulus

—
0.1 GPa0.01 Msi

Flexural Strength

—
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

—
900 J/m16.9 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
60 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.93 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.95 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

98°C208 °F
90°C194 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-50°C-58 °F
-25°C-13 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.05%
0.6%

Refractive Index

1.49
1.51

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
1.4%

Light Transmission

—
88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.24 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,100 J/kg·K0.5 BTU/lb·°F
2,200 J/kg·K0.53 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F
140 µm/m·K77.8 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-70°C-94 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

42°C108 °F
46°C115 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

58°C136 °F
64°C147 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
33°C91 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 65°C149 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 18% · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 90°C194 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
32 kV/mm813 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
2.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.03
0.01

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
78 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

15 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
88 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.6%
0.7%

Melt Flow Rate

6 g/10 min
5 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

180°C356 °F
220°C428 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

25°C77 °F
20°C68 °F

Polishability

—
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

84 MJ/kg36,114 BTU/lb
88 MJ/kg37,833 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.5 kg CO₂/kg
3 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

13 kN·m/kg
32 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.1 MN·m/kg
0.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

250 kJ/m³
402 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleEEAIonomer

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEEAIonomer
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

EEA vs Ionomer — frequently asked

Is Ionomer stronger than EEA?

Yes. Ionomer has a typical yield strength of 15 MPa (2.18 ksi) against 5 MPa (0.725 ksi) for EEA — about 3.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 12 MPa (1.74 ksi).

Which is cheaper, EEA or Ionomer?

EEA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Ionomer is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, EEA or Ionomer?

Ionomer, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 15/100 for EEA.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EEA and Ionomer side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.