FabDigitFabDigit

EEA vs EVOH

Polymer · grade comparison

EEA and EVOH are both polymer grades. EVOH is the stronger of the two: yield strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 5 MPa (0.725 ksi) for EEA, about 12 times as much; tensile strength follows at 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) vs 12 MPa (1.74 ksi). In exchange, EEA is the more ductile: elongation 700% versus 230% for EVOH, and EVOH is harder (78 Shore D vs 32 Shore D). EEA is lighter (0.93 g/cm³ vs 1.19 g/cm³ for EVOH) and EVOH is stiffer (2.9 GPa vs 0.05 GPa). On the shop floor, EVOH machines more easily (good vs poor), EEA welds better (excellent vs good), and EEA sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than EVOH (premium, $$$).

EEAChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

EVOHChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

EEA vs EVOH: properties

EEAEVOH

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.05 GPa0.01 Msi
2.9 GPa0.42 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.46
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

12 MPa1.7 ksi
68 MPa9.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

5 MPa0.73 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

700%
230%

Flexural Modulus

0.03 GPa0 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Hardness, Shore A

88 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

32 Shore D
78 Shore D

Tear Strength

60 kN/m343 lbf/in
—

Compressive Strength

—
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Flexural Strength

—
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Shear Strength

—
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

—
45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
85 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
118 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.93 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
1.19 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

98°C208 °F
183°C361 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-50°C-58 °F
69°C156 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.05%
5.5%

Refractive Index

1.49
1.53

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
9%

Light Transmission

—
91%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.33 W/m·K0.19 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,100 J/kg·K0.5 BTU/lb·°F
2,000 J/kg·K0.48 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F
85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

65°C149 °F
90°C194 °F

Min Service Temperature

-70°C-94 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

42°C108 °F
160°C320 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

58°C136 °F
168°C334 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
22%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
130°C266 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
68°C154 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
4

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.03
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
70 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

15 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.6%
1%

Melt Flow Rate

6 g/10 min
1.6 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

180°C356 °F
215°C419 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

25°C77 °F
60°C140 °F

Polishability

—
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

84 MJ/kg36,114 BTU/lb
90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.5 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

13 kN·m/kg
57 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.1 MN·m/kg
2.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

250 kJ/m³
580 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleEVOHEEA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEEAEVOH
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

EEA vs EVOH — frequently asked

Is EVOH stronger than EEA?

Yes. EVOH has a typical yield strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 5 MPa (0.725 ksi) for EEA — about 12 times as much. Tensile strength is 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) vs 12 MPa (1.74 ksi).

Which is cheaper, EEA or EVOH?

EEA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while EVOH is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, EEA or EVOH?

EVOH. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (15/100) for EEA; for welding the order is EEA first (excellent, 90/100) then EVOH (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EEA and EVOH side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.