FabDigitFabDigit

EEA vs EMAA

Polymer · grade comparison

EEA and EMAA are both polymer grades. EMAA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) against 5 MPa (0.725 ksi) for EEA, about 100% more; tensile strength follows at 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 12 MPa (1.74 ksi). In exchange, EEA is the more ductile: elongation 700% versus 400% for EMAA, and EMAA is harder (55 Shore D vs 32 Shore D). EMAA is stiffer (0.2 GPa vs 0.05 GPa) and EEA conducts heat better (0.3 W/m·K vs 0.25 W/m·K). On the shop floor, EMAA machines more easily (30 vs 15 out of 100) and EEA sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than EMAA (premium, $$$).

EEAChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

EMAAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

EEA vs EMAA: properties

EEAEMAA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.05 GPa0.01 Msi
0.2 GPa0.03 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.46
0.45

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

12 MPa1.7 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

5 MPa0.73 ksi
10 MPa1.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

700%
400%

Flexural Modulus

0.03 GPa0 Msi
0.2 GPa0.03 Msi

Hardness, Shore A

88 Shore A
94 Shore A

Hardness, Shore D

32 Shore D
55 Shore D

Tear Strength

60 kN/m343 lbf/in
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.93 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

98°C208 °F
95°C203 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-50°C-58 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.05%
0.15%

Refractive Index

1.49
1.51

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
0.6%

Light Transmission

—
88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F
180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

65°C149 °F
60°C140 °F

Min Service Temperature

-70°C-94 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

42°C108 °F
48°C118 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

58°C136 °F
65°C149 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
80°C176 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 2,100 J/kg·K0.5 BTU/lb·°F · Limiting Oxygen Index 18%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
2.8

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.03
0.015

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 25 kV/mm635 V/mil · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
70 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

15 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
85 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.6%
2%

Melt Flow Rate

6 g/10 min
10 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

180°C356 °F
210°C410 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

25°C77 °F
30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

84 MJ/kg36,114 BTU/lb
82 MJ/kg35,254 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.5 kg CO₂/kg
2.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb
110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

13 kN·m/kg
32 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.1 MN·m/kg
0.2 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Modulus of Resilience 250 kJ/m³ · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleEMAAEEA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEEAEMAA
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

EEA vs EMAA — frequently asked

Is EMAA stronger than EEA?

Yes. EMAA has a typical yield strength of 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) against 5 MPa (0.725 ksi) for EEA — about 100% more. Tensile strength is 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 12 MPa (1.74 ksi).

Which is cheaper, EEA or EMAA?

EEA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while EMAA is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, EEA or EMAA?

EMAA, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 15/100 for EEA.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EEA and EMAA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.