FabDigitFabDigit

EEA vs EVA

Polymer · grade comparison

EEA and EVA are both polymer grades. EVA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 7 MPa (1.02 ksi) against 5 MPa (0.725 ksi) for EEA, about 40% more; tensile strength follows at 17 MPa (2.47 ksi) vs 12 MPa (1.74 ksi). EVA is the more ductile: elongation 780% versus 700% for EEA. EVA conducts heat better (0.34 W/m·K vs 0.3 W/m·K). On the shop floor, EVA machines more easily (25 vs 15 out of 100) and EVA sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than EEA (standard, $$).

EVAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

EEA vs EVA: properties

EEAEVA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Poisson's Ratio

0.46
0.47

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

12 MPa1.7 ksi
17 MPa2.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

5 MPa0.73 ksi
7 MPa1 ksi

Elongation at Break

700%
780%

Flexural Modulus

0.03 GPa0 Msi
0.04 GPa0.01 Msi

Hardness, Shore A

88 Shore A
90 Shore A

Tear Strength

60 kN/m343 lbf/in
55 kN/m314 lbf/in

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 0.05 GPa0.01 Msi · Hardness, Shore D 32 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.93 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

98°C208 °F
86°C187 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-50°C-58 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.05%
0.08%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
0.3%

Light Transmission

—
88%

Same in both: Refractive Index 1.49

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.34 W/m·K0.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,100 J/kg·K0.5 BTU/lb·°F
2,300 J/kg·K0.55 BTU/lb·°F

Min Service Temperature

-70°C-94 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

42°C108 °F
44°C111 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

58°C136 °F
62°C144 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
19%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
85°C185 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 65°C149 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.9 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.03 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
82 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

15 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
90 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.6%
1.3%

Melt Flow Rate

6 g/10 min
2.5 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

180°C356 °F
165°C329 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

25°C77 °F
30°C86 °F

Polishability

—
30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

84 MJ/kg36,114 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.5 kg CO₂/kg
2.9 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

0%
5%

Same in both: Embodied Water 130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

13 kN·m/kg
18 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

250 kJ/m³
490 kJ/m³

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
1

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 0.1 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleEVAEEA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEEAEVA
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

EEA vs EVA — frequently asked

Is EVA stronger than EEA?

Yes. EVA has a typical yield strength of 7 MPa (1.02 ksi) against 5 MPa (0.725 ksi) for EEA — about 40% more. Tensile strength is 17 MPa (2.47 ksi) vs 12 MPa (1.74 ksi).

Which is cheaper, EEA or EVA?

EVA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while EEA is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, EEA or EVA?

EVA, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 15/100 for EEA.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EEA and EVA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.