FabDigitFabDigit

EMAA vs Ionomer

Polymer · grade comparison

EMAA and Ionomer are both polymer grades. Ionomer is the stronger of the two: yield strength 15 MPa (2.18 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for EMAA, about 50% more. Ionomer is harder — 60 Shore D against 55 Shore D for EMAA — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Ionomer is stiffer (0.28 GPa vs 0.2 GPa).

IonomerChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

EMAA vs Ionomer: properties

EMAAIonomer

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.2 GPa0.03 Msi
0.28 GPa0.04 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.44

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

10 MPa1.5 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

400%
380%

Flexural Modulus

0.2 GPa0.03 Msi
0.26 GPa0.04 Msi

Hardness, Shore D

55 Shore D
60 Shore D

Shear Modulus

—
0.1 GPa0.01 Msi

Flexural Strength

—
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

—
900 J/m16.9 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
60 HRR

Same in both: Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 30 MPa4.4 ksi · Hardness, Shore A 94 Shore A

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.95 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

95°C203 °F
90°C194 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-20°C-4 °F
-25°C-13 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.15%
0.6%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.6%
1.4%

Same in both: Refractive Index 1.51 · Light Transmission 88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.24 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,100 J/kg·K0.5 BTU/lb·°F
2,200 J/kg·K0.53 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F
140 µm/m·K77.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

60°C140 °F
65°C149 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

48°C118 °F
46°C115 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

65°C149 °F
64°C147 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

80°C176 °F
90°C194 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
33°C91 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 18%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
32 kV/mm813 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.8
2.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.015
0.01

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
78 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
88 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
0.7%

Melt Flow Rate

10 g/10 min
5 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

210°C410 °F
220°C428 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
20°C68 °F

Polishability

—
70 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 30 / 100 · Weldability 92 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

82 MJ/kg35,254 BTU/lb
88 MJ/kg37,833 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.2 MN·m/kg
0.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

250 kJ/m³
402 kJ/m³

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 32 kN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleEMAAIonomer

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEMAAIonomer
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

EMAA vs Ionomer — frequently asked

Is Ionomer stronger than EMAA?

Yes. Ionomer has a typical yield strength of 15 MPa (2.18 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for EMAA — about 50% more. Tensile strength is 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi).

Which is cheaper, EMAA or Ionomer?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose EMAA over Ionomer?

Pick Ionomer when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EMAA and Ionomer side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.