FabDigitFabDigit

CPVC 4120 vs PVC-M

Polymer · grade comparison

CPVC 4120 and PVC-M are both polymer grades. CPVC 4120 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) against 44 MPa (6.38 ksi) for PVC-M, about 18% more; tensile strength follows at 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 47 MPa (6.82 ksi). In exchange, PVC-M is the more ductile: elongation 100% versus 25% for CPVC 4120. PVC-M is lighter (1.4 g/cm³ vs 1.53 g/cm³ for CPVC 4120) and CPVC 4120 is stiffer (3 GPa vs 2.7 GPa). On the shop floor, PVC-M welds better (80 vs 70 out of 100) and PVC-M sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than CPVC 4120 (standard, $$).

CPVC 4120Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PVC-MChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

CPVC 4120 vs PVC-M: properties

CPVC 4120PVC-M

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
2.7 GPa0.39 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
1 GPa0.15 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
47 MPa6.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
44 MPa6.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
100%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Flexural Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
72 MPa10.4 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
2.7 GPa0.38 Msi

Shear Strength

42 MPa6.1 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
4.5 MPa·√m4.1 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

110 J/m2.1 ft·lbf/in
600 J/m11.2 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
108 HRR

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
68 HRM

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 4 GPa0.61 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.53 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.4 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

120°C248 °F
78°C172 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.04%
0.1%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.15%
0.35%

Refractive Index

1.53
1.54

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.14 W/m·K0.08 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

950 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
980 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

93°C199 °F
60°C140 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

118°C244 °F
71°C160 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

104°C219 °F
65°C149 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

113°C235 °F
78°C172 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

60%
38%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

105°C221 °F
70°C158 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.3
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
0.016

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
78 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.4%
0.3%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
192°C378 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

50°C122 °F
40°C104 °F

Same in both: Polishability 50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

72 MJ/kg30,954 BTU/lb
68 MJ/kg29,235 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.9 kg CO₂/kg
2.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

2%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

36 kN·m/kg
34 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2 MN·m/kg
1.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

451 kJ/m³
359 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePVC-MCPVC 4120

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCPVC 4120PVC-M
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

CPVC 4120 vs PVC-M — frequently asked

Is CPVC 4120 stronger than PVC-M?

Yes. CPVC 4120 has a typical yield strength of 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) against 44 MPa (6.38 ksi) for PVC-M — about 18% more. Tensile strength is 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 47 MPa (6.82 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CPVC 4120 or PVC-M?

PVC-M is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while CPVC 4120 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, CPVC 4120 or PVC-M?

PVC-M. Its weldability rates very good (80/100) against very good (70/100) for CPVC 4120.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CPVC 4120 and PVC-M side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.