FabDigitFabDigit

CPVC 4120 vs PVC-O

Polymer · grade comparison

CPVC 4120 and PVC-O are both polymer grades. PVC-O is the stronger of the two: yield strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) for CPVC 4120, about 12% more; tensile strength follows at 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) vs 55 MPa (7.98 ksi). PVC-O is the more ductile: elongation 90% versus 25% for CPVC 4120. PVC-O is lighter (1.4 g/cm³ vs 1.53 g/cm³ for CPVC 4120) and PVC-O is stiffer (3.8 GPa vs 3 GPa). On the shop floor, CPVC 4120 machines more easily (80 vs 70 out of 100) and CPVC 4120 welds better (very good vs poor).

CPVC 4120Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

PVC-OChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

CPVC 4120 vs PVC-O: properties

CPVC 4120PVC-O

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
3.8 GPa0.55 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.61 Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
78 MPa11.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
90%

Compressive Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Shear Strength

42 MPa6.1 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
4.5 MPa·√m4.1 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

110 J/m2.1 ft·lbf/in
400 J/m7.5 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
115 HRR

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.38 · Compressive Strength 65 MPa9.4 ksi · Hardness, Shore D 82 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.53 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.4 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

120°C248 °F
80°C176 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.15%
0.2%

Refractive Index

1.53
—

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.04%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.14 W/m·K0.08 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

93°C199 °F
45°C113 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-10°C14 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

118°C244 °F
76°C169 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

104°C219 °F
70°C158 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

113°C235 °F
82°C180 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

60%
43%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

105°C221 °F
60°C140 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 950 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.3
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
0.015

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.4%
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
190°C374 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

50°C122 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

72 MJ/kg30,954 BTU/lb
65 MJ/kg27,945 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.9 kg CO₂/kg
2.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

2%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

36 kN·m/kg
56 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2 MN·m/kg
2.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

451 kJ/m³
443 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePVC-OCPVC 4120

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCPVC 4120PVC-O
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

CPVC 4120 vs PVC-O — frequently asked

Is PVC-O stronger than CPVC 4120?

Yes. PVC-O has a typical yield strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) for CPVC 4120 — about 12% more. Tensile strength is 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) vs 55 MPa (7.98 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CPVC 4120 or PVC-O?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CPVC 4120 or PVC-O?

CPVC 4120, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 80/100 against 70/100 for PVC-O; for welding the order is CPVC 4120 first (very good, 70/100) then PVC-O (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CPVC 4120 and PVC-O side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.