FabDigitFabDigit

CA vs EC

Polymer · grade comparison

CA and EC are both polymer grades. CA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) against 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) for EC, about 35% more; tensile strength follows at 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) vs 34 MPa (4.93 ksi). CA is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 24% for EC. EC is lighter (1.12 g/cm³ vs 1.3 g/cm³ for CA) and CA is stiffer (1.6 GPa vs 1.3 GPa).

CAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ECChoose it when weight is the constraint.

CA vs EC: properties

CAEC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.6 GPa0.23 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.6 GPa0.09 Msi
0.45 GPa0.07 Msi

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.39 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

40 MPa5.8 ksi
34 MPa4.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

35 MPa5.1 ksi
26 MPa3.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
24%

Compressive Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Compressive Modulus

1.7 GPa0.25 Msi
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Flexural Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.8 GPa0.26 Msi
1.3 GPa0.18 Msi

Shear Strength

38 MPa5.5 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

110 J/m2.1 ft·lbf/in
180 J/m3.4 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell R

100 HRR
74 HRR

Tear Strength

—
45 kN/m257 lbf/in

Same in both: Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in · Hardness, Shore D 78 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.3 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.12 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

120°C248 °F
90°C194 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

2.5%
1.7%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

7%
3.5%

Refractive Index

1.48
1.47

Light Transmission

90%
86%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,480 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F
140 µm/m·K77.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

65°C149 °F
68°C154 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-35°C-31 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

70°C158 °F
60°C140 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

55°C131 °F
50°C122 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

75°C167 °F
69°C156 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
19%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
95°C203 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

18 kV/mm457 V/mil
21 kV/mm533 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.04
0.013

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·cm
5×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
60 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

50 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
58 / 100

Formability (cold)

78 / 100
62 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
180°C356 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
6 g/10 min

Same in both: Mold Shrinkage 0.5% · Mold Temperature (typ.) 55°C131 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

2%
0%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
30 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

383 kJ/m³
260 kJ/m³

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 1.2 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCAEC

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCAEC
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

CA vs EC — frequently asked

Is CA stronger than EC?

Yes. CA has a typical yield strength of 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) against 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) for EC — about 35% more. Tensile strength is 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) vs 34 MPa (4.93 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CA or EC?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CA or EC?

EC, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 80/100 against 75/100 for CA.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CA and EC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.