FabDigitFabDigit

CN vs EC

Polymer · grade comparison

CN and EC are both polymer grades. CN is the stronger of the two: yield strength 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) for EC, about 62% more; tensile strength follows at 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) vs 34 MPa (4.93 ksi). CN is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 24% for EC. EC is lighter (1.12 g/cm³ vs 1.38 g/cm³ for CN) and CN is stiffer (1.8 GPa vs 1.3 GPa). On the shop floor, CN welds better (very good vs good).

CNChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ECChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

CN vs EC: properties

CNEC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.8 GPa0.26 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
34 MPa4.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
26 MPa3.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
24%

Compressive Strength

62 MPa9 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Flexural Strength

68 MPa9.9 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.7 GPa0.25 Msi
1.3 GPa0.18 Msi

Shear Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

320 J/m6 ft·lbf/in
180 J/m3.4 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

80 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
74 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.45 GPa0.07 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in

Tear Strength

—
45 kN/m257 lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.38 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.12 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

55°C131 °F
90°C194 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

1.8%
1.7%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

4.5%
3.5%

Refractive Index

1.5
1.47

Light Transmission

88%
86%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,480 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F
140 µm/m·K77.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

55°C131 °F
68°C154 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-35°C-31 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

68°C154 °F
60°C140 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

52°C126 °F
50°C122 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

75°C167 °F
69°C156 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

85°C185 °F
95°C203 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

—
19%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
21 kV/mm533 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

6
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.09
0.013

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
5×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
60 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

12 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
58 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
62 / 100

Polishability

92 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
0.5%

Melt Flow Rate

—
6 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
180°C356 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
55°C131 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

38 kN·m/kg
30 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.3 MN·m/kg
1.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

490 kJ/m³
260 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCNEC

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCNEC
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

CN vs EC — frequently asked

Is CN stronger than EC?

Yes. CN has a typical yield strength of 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) for EC — about 62% more. Tensile strength is 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) vs 34 MPa (4.93 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CN or EC?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CN or EC?

CN. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (80/100) for EC; for welding the order is CN first (very good, 70/100) then EC (good, 58/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CN and EC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.