FabDigitFabDigit

CA vs CN

Polymer · grade comparison

CA and CN are both polymer grades. CN is the stronger of the two: yield strength 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for CA, about 20% more; tensile strength follows at 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) vs 40 MPa (5.8 ksi). CN is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 30% for CA. CA is lighter (1.3 g/cm³ vs 1.38 g/cm³ for CN) and CN is stiffer (1.8 GPa vs 1.6 GPa). On the shop floor, CN machines more easily (excellent vs very good) and CN welds better (very good vs good).

CAChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

CNChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

CA vs CN: properties

CACN

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.6 GPa0.23 Msi
1.8 GPa0.26 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.6 GPa0.09 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.39 Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

40 MPa5.8 ksi
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

35 MPa5.1 ksi
42 MPa6.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
35%

Compressive Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

1.7 GPa0.25 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
68 MPa9.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.8 GPa0.26 Msi
1.7 GPa0.25 Msi

Shear Strength

38 MPa5.5 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

110 J/m2.1 ft·lbf/in
320 J/m6 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
80 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

100 HRR
105 HRR

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.4

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.3 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.38 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

120°C248 °F
55°C131 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

2.5%
1.8%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

7%
4.5%

Refractive Index

1.48
1.5

Light Transmission

90%
88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F
110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

65°C149 °F
55°C131 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

70°C158 °F
68°C154 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

55°C131 °F
52°C126 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
—

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
85°C185 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Vicat Softening Point (B50) 75°C167 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

18 kV/mm457 V/mil
16 kV/mm406 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4
6

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.04
0.09

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·cm
1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
45 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

50 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
85 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

78 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
92 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.5%
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

55°C131 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

2%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
38 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.2 MN·m/kg
1.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

383 kJ/m³
490 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCNCA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCACN
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

CA vs CN — frequently asked

Is CN stronger than CA?

Yes. CN has a typical yield strength of 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for CA — about 20% more. Tensile strength is 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) vs 40 MPa (5.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CA or CN?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CA or CN?

CN. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (75/100) for CA; for welding the order is CN first (very good, 70/100) then CA (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CA and CN side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.