FabDigitFabDigit

CA vs CAB

Polymer · grade comparison

CA and CAB are both polymer grades. CA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) against 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) for CAB, about 25% more; tensile strength follows at 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) vs 32 MPa (4.64 ksi). In exchange, CAB is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 30% for CA. CAB is lighter (1.19 g/cm³ vs 1.3 g/cm³ for CA) and CA is stiffer (1.6 GPa vs 1.4 GPa).

CAChoose it when strength drives the design.

CABChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

CA vs CAB: properties

CACAB

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.6 GPa0.23 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.6 GPa0.09 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.39 Msi
2 GPa0.32 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

40 MPa5.8 ksi
32 MPa4.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

35 MPa5.1 ksi
28 MPa4.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
60%

Compressive Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

1.7 GPa0.25 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Flexural Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.8 GPa0.26 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Shear Strength

38 MPa5.5 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

110 J/m2.1 ft·lbf/in
200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
75 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

100 HRR
95 HRR

Same in both: Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.3 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.19 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

120°C248 °F
115°C239 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

2.5%
1.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

7%
2.6%

Refractive Index

1.48
1.475

Light Transmission

90%
89%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

65°C149 °F
70°C158 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

70°C158 °F
75°C167 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

55°C131 °F
58°C136 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

75°C167 °F
100°C212 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
20%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
95°C203 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

18 kV/mm457 V/mil
16 kV/mm406 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4
3.4

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.04
0.03

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
50 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

50 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

78 / 100
80 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

—
10 g/10 min

Same in both: Machinability 75 / 100 · Polishability 85 / 100 · Mold Shrinkage 0.5% · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 200°C392 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 55°C131 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

2%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
27 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

383 kJ/m³
280 kJ/m³

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 1.2 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCACAB

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCACAB
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

CA vs CAB — frequently asked

Is CA stronger than CAB?

Yes. CA has a typical yield strength of 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) against 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) for CAB — about 25% more. Tensile strength is 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) vs 32 MPa (4.64 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CA or CAB?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, CA or CAB?

CAB. Its weldability rates good (60/100) against good (55/100) for CA.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CA and CAB side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.