FabDigitFabDigit

CAB vs EC

Polymer · grade comparison

CAB and EC are both polymer grades. CAB is the stronger of the two: yield strength 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) against 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) for EC, about 8% more. CAB is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 24% for EC. EC is lighter (1.12 g/cm³ vs 1.19 g/cm³ for CAB) and CAB is stiffer (1.4 GPa vs 1.3 GPa).

CABChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ECChoose it when weight is the constraint.

CAB vs EC: properties

CABEC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.5 GPa0.07 Msi
0.45 GPa0.07 Msi

Bulk Modulus

2 GPa0.32 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

32 MPa4.6 ksi
34 MPa4.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

28 MPa4.1 ksi
26 MPa3.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

60%
24%

Compressive Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Compressive Modulus

1.3 GPa0.19 Msi
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Flexural Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.3 GPa0.19 Msi
1.3 GPa0.18 Msi

Shear Strength

30 MPa4.4 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
180 J/m3.4 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

75 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

95 HRR
74 HRR

Tear Strength

—
45 kN/m257 lbf/in

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.38 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.19 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.12 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

115°C239 °F
90°C194 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

1.3%
1.7%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2.6%
3.5%

Refractive Index

1.475
1.47

Light Transmission

89%
86%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,480 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F
140 µm/m·K77.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
68°C154 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-35°C-31 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

75°C167 °F
60°C140 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

58°C136 °F
50°C122 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
69°C156 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

20%
19%

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (short-term) 95°C203 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
21 kV/mm533 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.4
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.03
0.013

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
5×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Same in both: Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

50 / 100
60 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

70 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
58 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
62 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

10 g/10 min
6 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
180°C356 °F

Same in both: Mold Shrinkage 0.5% · Mold Temperature (typ.) 55°C131 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
30 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

280 kJ/m³
260 kJ/m³

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 1.2 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCABEC

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCABEC
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

CAB vs EC — frequently asked

Is CAB stronger than EC?

Yes. CAB has a typical yield strength of 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) against 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) for EC — about 8% more. Tensile strength is 32 MPa (4.64 ksi) vs 34 MPa (4.93 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CAB or EC?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CAB or EC?

EC, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 80/100 against 75/100 for CAB.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CAB and EC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.