FabDigitFabDigit

CAP vs EC

Polymer · grade comparison

CAP and EC are both polymer grades. CAP is the stronger of the two: yield strength 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) against 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) for EC, about 15% more. CAP is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 24% for EC. EC is lighter (1.12 g/cm³ vs 1.21 g/cm³ for CAP) and CAP is stiffer (1.4 GPa vs 1.3 GPa).

CAPChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ECChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

CAP vs EC: properties

CAPEC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.39
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

32 MPa4.6 ksi
34 MPa4.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

30 MPa4.4 ksi
26 MPa3.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

50%
24%

Compressive Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Flexural Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.3 GPa0.19 Msi
1.3 GPa0.18 Msi

Shear Strength

26 MPa3.8 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

160 J/m3 ft·lbf/in
180 J/m3.4 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell R

95 HRR
74 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.45 GPa0.07 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in

Tear Strength

—
45 kN/m257 lbf/in

Same in both: Hardness, Shore D 78 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.21 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.12 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

190°C374 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

142°C288 °F
90°C194 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

1.8%
1.7%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

3%
3.5%

Light Transmission

89%
86%

Same in both: Refractive Index 1.47

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.21 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,480 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F
140 µm/m·K77.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

60°C140 °F
68°C154 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-35°C-31 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

75°C167 °F
60°C140 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

55°C131 °F
50°C122 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

105°C221 °F
69°C156 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
95°C203 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 19%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

17 kV/mm432 V/mil
21 kV/mm533 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.4
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
0.013

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
5×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
60 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
58 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
62 / 100

Polishability

92 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.45%
0.5%

Melt Flow Rate

8 g/10 min
6 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

215°C419 °F
180°C356 °F

Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 55°C131 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
30 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

321 kJ/m³
260 kJ/m³

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 1.2 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCAPEC

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCAPEC
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

CAP vs EC — frequently asked

Is CAP stronger than EC?

Yes. CAP has a typical yield strength of 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) against 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) for EC — about 15% more. Tensile strength is 32 MPa (4.64 ksi) vs 34 MPa (4.93 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CAP or EC?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose CAP over EC?

Pick CAP when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded. Pick EC when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CAP and EC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.