FabDigitFabDigit

CAB vs CN

Polymer · grade comparison

CAB and CN are both polymer grades. CN is the stronger of the two: yield strength 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) for CAB, about 50% more; tensile strength follows at 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) vs 32 MPa (4.64 ksi). In exchange, CAB is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 35% for CN, and CN is harder (80 Shore D vs 75 Shore D). CAB is lighter (1.19 g/cm³ vs 1.38 g/cm³ for CN) and CN is stiffer (1.8 GPa vs 1.4 GPa). On the shop floor, CN machines more easily (excellent vs very good) and CN welds better (very good vs good).

CABChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

CNChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

CAB vs CN: properties

CABCN

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
1.8 GPa0.26 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.5 GPa0.07 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

2 GPa0.32 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

32 MPa4.6 ksi
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

28 MPa4.1 ksi
42 MPa6.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

60%
35%

Compressive Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

1.3 GPa0.19 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
68 MPa9.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.3 GPa0.19 Msi
1.7 GPa0.25 Msi

Shear Strength

30 MPa4.4 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
320 J/m6 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

75 Shore D
80 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

95 HRR
105 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.19 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.38 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

115°C239 °F
55°C131 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

1.3%
1.8%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2.6%
4.5%

Refractive Index

1.475
1.5

Light Transmission

89%
88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F
110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
55°C131 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

75°C167 °F
68°C154 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

58°C136 °F
52°C126 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
75°C167 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

20%
—

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
85°C185 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.4
6

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.03
0.09

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 16 kV/mm406 V/mil

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

50 / 100
45 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

70 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
85 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
92 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.5%
—

Melt Flow Rate

10 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

55°C131 °F
—

Same in both: Formability (cold) 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.5 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
38 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.2 MN·m/kg
1.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

280 kJ/m³
490 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCNCAB

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCABCN
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

CAB vs CN — frequently asked

Is CN stronger than CAB?

Yes. CN has a typical yield strength of 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) for CAB — about 50% more. Tensile strength is 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) vs 32 MPa (4.64 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CAB or CN?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CAB or CN?

CN. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (75/100) for CAB; for welding the order is CN first (very good, 70/100) then CAB (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CAB and CN side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.