FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs CAB

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and CAB are both polymer grades. ABS is the stronger of the two: yield strength 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) for CAB, about 50% more; tensile strength follows at 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) vs 32 MPa (4.64 ksi). In exchange, CAB is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 25% for ABS. ABS is lighter (1.04 g/cm³ vs 1.19 g/cm³ for CAB) and ABS is stiffer (2.3 GPa vs 1.4 GPa). On the shop floor, ABS welds better (very good vs good) and ABS sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than CAB (premium, $$$).

ABSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

CABChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ABS vs CAB: properties

ABSCAB

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
2 GPa0.32 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
32 MPa4.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
28 MPa4.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
60%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
75 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
95 HRR

Same in both: Izod Impact, Notched 200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.19 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
115°C239 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
1.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
2.6%

Refractive Index

—
1.475

Light Transmission

—
89%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
70°C158 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
75°C167 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
58°C136 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
20%

Same in both: Vicat Softening Point (B50) 100°C212 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 95°C203 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
3.4

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
0.03

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 16 kV/mm406 V/mil · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
50 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
75 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
85 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.5%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
10 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
200°C392 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
55°C131 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
27 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
1.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

383 kJ/m³
280 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABSCAB

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSCAB
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

ABS vs CAB — frequently asked

Is ABS stronger than CAB?

Yes. ABS has a typical yield strength of 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) for CAB — about 50% more. Tensile strength is 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) vs 32 MPa (4.64 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ABS or CAB?

ABS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while CAB is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ABS or CAB?

ABS, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 80/100 against 75/100 for CAB; for welding the order is ABS first (very good, 78/100) then CAB (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and CAB side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.