FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum A356/SiC/10p vs AlSiC-9

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum A356/SiC/10p and AlSiC-9 are both aluminum grades. A356/SiC/10p is the stronger of the two: yield strength 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for AlSiC-9, about 50% more; tensile strength follows at 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi). A356/SiC/10p is the more ductile: elongation 1% versus 0.4% for AlSiC-9, and AlSiC-9 is harder (215 HB vs 90 HB). A356/SiC/10p is lighter (2.72 g/cm³ vs 3.01 g/cm³ for AlSiC-9) and AlSiC-9 is stiffer (188 GPa vs 81.4 GPa). On the shop floor, A356/SiC/10p machines more easily (poor vs not recommended) and A356/SiC/10p welds better (fair vs not recommended).

A356/SiC/10pChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

AlSiC-9Choose it when the part sees heat.

A356/SiC/10p vs AlSiC-9: properties

A356/SiC/10pAlSiC-9

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

81.4 GPa11.8 Msi
188 GPa27.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

31 GPa4.5 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
116 GPa16.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.23

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

285 MPa41.3 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

1%
0.4%

Shear Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

17 MPa·√m15.5 ksi·√in
8.5 MPa·√m7.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

90 HB
215 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

55 HRB
97 HRB

Compressive Strength

—
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
20 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

—
230 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.72 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
3.01 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 557°C1,035 °F · Liquidus Temperature 613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

170 W/m·K98.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19.5 µm/m·K10.8 µin/in·°F
8.5 µm/m·K4.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

355 J/g153 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-269°C-452 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
14 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in
1.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.72 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.8 V
-0.75 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
8 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
5%

Weldability

35 / 100
8 / 100

Formability (cold)

8 / 100
3 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb
250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13.5 kg CO₂/kg
18 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

114 kN·m/kg
70 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

29.9 MN·m/kg
62.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

499 kJ/m³
96 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

71 mm²/s
84.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

33
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA356/SiC/10pAlSiC-9

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA356/SiC/10pAlSiC-9
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

A356/SiC/10p vs AlSiC-9 — frequently asked

Is A356/SiC/10p stronger than AlSiC-9?

Yes. A356/SiC/10p has a typical yield strength of 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for AlSiC-9 — about 50% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A356/SiC/10p or AlSiC-9?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, A356/SiC/10p or AlSiC-9?

A356/SiC/10p. Its machinability rates poor (25/100) against not recommended (8/100) for AlSiC-9; for welding the order is A356/SiC/10p first (fair, 35/100) then AlSiC-9 (not recommended, 8/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A356/SiC/10p and AlSiC-9 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.