FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum A356/SiC/10p vs A356/SiC/20p

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum A356/SiC/10p and A356/SiC/20p are both aluminum grades. A356/SiC/20p is the stronger of the two: yield strength 303 MPa (43.9 ksi) against 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) for A356/SiC/10p, about 6% more; tensile strength follows at 338 MPa (49 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). In exchange, A356/SiC/10p is the more ductile: elongation 1% versus 0.5% for A356/SiC/20p, and A356/SiC/20p is harder (118 HB vs 90 HB). A356/SiC/20p is stiffer (98 GPa vs 81.4 GPa) and A356/SiC/10p conducts electricity better (33 % IACS vs 28 % IACS). On the shop floor, A356/SiC/10p machines more easily (25 vs 15 out of 100) and A356/SiC/10p welds better (fair vs poor).

A356/SiC/10pChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

A356/SiC/20pChoose it when strength drives the design.

A356/SiC/10p vs A356/SiC/20p: properties

A356/SiC/10pA356/SiC/20p

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

81.4 GPa11.8 Msi
98 GPa14.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

31 GPa4.5 Msi
38 GPa5.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
338 MPa49 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

285 MPa41.3 ksi
303 MPa43.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

1%
0.5%

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

17 MPa·√m15.5 ksi·√in
14 MPa·√m12.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

90 HB
118 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

55 HRB
—

Compressive Strength

—
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Vickers

—
125 HV

Same in both: Shear Strength 205 MPa29.7 ksi · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 120 MPa17.4 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.72 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.76 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 557°C1,035 °F · Liquidus Temperature 613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

170 W/m·K98.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
180 W/m·K104 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
854 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19.5 µm/m·K10.8 µin/in·°F
17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

355 J/g153 BTU/lb
300 J/g129 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
28 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in
6.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.44 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.8 V
-0.82 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
52 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
15 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
12%

Weldability

35 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 8 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb
235 MJ/kg101,032 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13.5 kg CO₂/kg
14.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

15%
10%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

114 kN·m/kg
122 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

29.9 MN·m/kg
35.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

499 kJ/m³
468 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

71 mm²/s
76.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

33
35

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA356/SiC/10pA356/SiC/20p

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA356/SiC/10pA356/SiC/20p
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

A356/SiC/10p vs A356/SiC/20p — frequently asked

Is A356/SiC/20p stronger than A356/SiC/10p?

Yes. A356/SiC/20p has a typical yield strength of 303 MPa (43.9 ksi) against 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) for A356/SiC/10p — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 338 MPa (49 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A356/SiC/10p or A356/SiC/20p?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, A356/SiC/10p or A356/SiC/20p?

A356/SiC/10p, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 15/100 for A356/SiC/20p; for welding the order is A356/SiC/10p first (fair, 35/100) then A356/SiC/20p (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A356/SiC/10p and A356/SiC/20p side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.