FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2009/SiC/15p vs AlSiC-9

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 2009/SiC/15p and AlSiC-9 are both aluminum grades. 2009/SiC/15p is the stronger of the two: yield strength 365 MPa (52.9 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for AlSiC-9, about 92% more; tensile strength follows at 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi). 2009/SiC/15p is the more ductile: elongation 7% versus 0.4% for AlSiC-9, and AlSiC-9 is harder (215 HB vs 125 HB). 2009/SiC/15p is lighter (2.84 g/cm³ vs 3.01 g/cm³ for AlSiC-9) and AlSiC-9 is stiffer (188 GPa vs 98 GPa). On the shop floor, 2009/SiC/15p welds better (poor vs not recommended).

2009/SiC/15pChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

AlSiC-9Choose it when the part sees heat.

2009/SiC/15p vs AlSiC-9: properties

2009/SiC/15pAlSiC-9

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

98 GPa14.2 Msi
188 GPa27.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

38 GPa5.5 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

82 GPa11.9 Msi
116 GPa16.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.23

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

365 MPa52.9 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

7%
0.4%

Compressive Strength

390 MPa56.6 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Shear Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

205 MPa29.7 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

25 MPa·√m22.8 ksi·√in
8.5 MPa·√m7.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

125 HB
215 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

80 HRB
97 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
20 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

—
230 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.84 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
3.01 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

502°C936 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

638°C1,180 °F
613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

145 W/m·K83.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

860 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
8.5 µm/m·K4.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

330 J/g142 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-269°C-452 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

26 % IACS
14 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.6 µΩ·in
1.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.72 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.68 V
-0.75 V

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

15 / 100
8 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

10%
5%

Weldability

20 / 100
8 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
3 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

—
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb
250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

16 kg CO₂/kg
18 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

2%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

194 kN·m/kg
70 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

34.5 MN·m/kg
62.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

680 kJ/m³
96 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

59.4 mm²/s
84.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

45
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2009/SiC/15pAlSiC-9

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability2009/SiC/15pAlSiC-9
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

2009/SiC/15p vs AlSiC-9 — frequently asked

Is 2009/SiC/15p stronger than AlSiC-9?

Yes. 2009/SiC/15p has a typical yield strength of 365 MPa (52.9 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for AlSiC-9 — about 92% more. Tensile strength is 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2009/SiC/15p or AlSiC-9?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 2009/SiC/15p or AlSiC-9?

2009/SiC/15p. Its machinability rates poor (15/100) against not recommended (8/100) for AlSiC-9; for welding the order is 2009/SiC/15p first (poor, 20/100) then AlSiC-9 (not recommended, 8/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2009/SiC/15p and AlSiC-9 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.