FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 8009/SiC vs AlSiC-9

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 8009/SiC and AlSiC-9 are both aluminum grades. 8009/SiC is the stronger of the two: yield strength 425 MPa (61.6 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for AlSiC-9, about 124% more; tensile strength follows at 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi). 8009/SiC is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 0.4% for AlSiC-9, and AlSiC-9 is harder (215 HB vs 150 HB). AlSiC-9 is stiffer (188 GPa vs 100 GPa) and AlSiC-9 runs hotter in service (350°C vs 315°C continuous). On the shop floor, 8009/SiC machines more easily (poor vs not recommended).

8009/SiCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

AlSiC-9Choose it when the part sees heat.

8009/SiC vs AlSiC-9: properties

8009/SiCAlSiC-9

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
188 GPa27.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

39 GPa5.7 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

83 GPa12 Msi
116 GPa16.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.23

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

500 MPa72.5 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

425 MPa61.6 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
0.4%

Compressive Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Shear Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

16 MPa·√m14.6 ksi·√in
8.5 MPa·√m7.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
215 HB

Hardness, Vickers

170 HV
230 HV

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
97 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
20 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.95 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³
3.01 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

640°C1,184 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

—
613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

125 W/m·K72.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

870 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19.5 µm/m·K10.8 µin/in·°F
8.5 µm/m·K4.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

315°C599 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-269°C-452 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

28 % IACS
14 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.44 µΩ·in
1.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.72 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.75 V

Corrosion Resistance

42 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

18 / 100
8 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

12%
5%

Weldability

12 / 100
8 / 100

Formability (cold)

18 / 100
3 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

—
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

320 MJ/kg137,575 BTU/lb
250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

24 kg CO₂/kg
18 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,300 L/kg156 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

169 kN·m/kg
70 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

33.9 MN·m/kg
62.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

903 kJ/m³
96 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48.7 mm²/s
84.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

32
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale8009/SiCAlSiC-9

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability8009/SiCAlSiC-9
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

8009/SiC vs AlSiC-9 — frequently asked

Is 8009/SiC stronger than AlSiC-9?

Yes. 8009/SiC has a typical yield strength of 425 MPa (61.6 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for AlSiC-9 — about 124% more. Tensile strength is 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 8009/SiC or AlSiC-9?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 8009/SiC or AlSiC-9?

8009/SiC. Its machinability rates poor (18/100) against not recommended (8/100) for AlSiC-9.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 8009/SiC and AlSiC-9 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.