FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum A356/SiC/10p vs Al2O3f/AC8A

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum A356/SiC/10p and Al2O3f/AC8A are both aluminum grades. A356/SiC/10p is the stronger of the two: yield strength 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) against 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) for Al2O3f/AC8A, about 24% more; tensile strength follows at 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 260 MPa (37.7 ksi). A356/SiC/10p is the more ductile: elongation 1% versus 0.6% for Al2O3f/AC8A, and Al2O3f/AC8A is harder (125 HB vs 90 HB). Al2O3f/AC8A is stiffer (95 GPa vs 81.4 GPa) and Al2O3f/AC8A runs hotter in service (350°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, A356/SiC/10p welds better (fair vs not recommended).

A356/SiC/10pChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Al2O3f/AC8AChoose it when the part sees heat.

A356/SiC/10p vs Al2O3f/AC8A: properties

A356/SiC/10pAl2O3f/AC8A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

81.4 GPa11.8 Msi
95 GPa13.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

31 GPa4.5 Msi
37 GPa5.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

285 MPa41.3 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

1%
0.6%

Shear Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

17 MPa·√m15.5 ksi·√in
12 MPa·√m10.9 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

90 HB
125 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

55 HRB
70 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
0.8%

Compressive Strength

—
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
2 J1.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Vickers

—
135 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.72 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

557°C1,035 °F
520°C968 °F

Liquidus Temperature

613°C1,135 °F
575°C1,067 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

170 W/m·K98.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
100 W/m·K57.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19.5 µm/m·K10.8 µin/in·°F
17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

355 J/g153 BTU/lb
440 J/g189 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
24 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
42 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.8 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
25%

Weldability

35 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

8 / 100
5 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb
120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13.5 kg CO₂/kg
9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,000 L/kg120 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

114 kN·m/kg
93 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

29.9 MN·m/kg
34.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

499 kJ/m³
278 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

71 mm²/s
40.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

33
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA356/SiC/10pAl2O3f/AC8A

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA356/SiC/10pAl2O3f/AC8A
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

A356/SiC/10p vs Al2O3f/AC8A — frequently asked

Is A356/SiC/10p stronger than Al2O3f/AC8A?

Yes. A356/SiC/10p has a typical yield strength of 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) against 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) for Al2O3f/AC8A — about 24% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 260 MPa (37.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A356/SiC/10p or Al2O3f/AC8A?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, A356/SiC/10p or Al2O3f/AC8A?

A356/SiC/10p, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 20/100 for Al2O3f/AC8A; for welding the order is A356/SiC/10p first (fair, 35/100) then Al2O3f/AC8A (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A356/SiC/10p and Al2O3f/AC8A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.