FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6061/Al2O3/20p vs A356/SiC/20p

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6061/Al2O3/20p and A356/SiC/20p are both aluminum grades. 6061/Al2O3/20p is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 359 MPa (52.1 ksi) against 338 MPa (49 ksi) for A356/SiC/20p, about 6% more. 6061/Al2O3/20p is the more ductile: elongation 2.5% versus 0.5% for A356/SiC/20p, and A356/SiC/20p is harder (118 HB vs 110 HB). A356/SiC/20p is lighter (2.76 g/cm³ vs 2.9 g/cm³ for 6061/Al2O3/20p) and A356/SiC/20p runs hotter in service (200°C vs 180°C continuous). On the shop floor, 6061/Al2O3/20p welds better (fair vs poor).

6061/Al2O3/20pChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

A356/SiC/20pChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

6061/Al2O3/20p vs A356/SiC/20p: properties

6061/Al2O3/20pA356/SiC/20p

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

359 MPa52.1 ksi
338 MPa49 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

317 MPa46 ksi
303 MPa43.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

2.5%
0.5%

Reduction in Area

3%
—

Compressive Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Shear Strength

215 MPa31.2 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

140 MPa20.3 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

17 MPa·√m15.5 ksi·√in
14 MPa·√m12.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

110 HB
118 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

66 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

118 HV
125 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 98 GPa14.2 Msi · Shear Modulus 38 GPa5.5 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.9 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.76 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

582°C1,080 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

652°C1,206 °F
613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

150 W/m·K86.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
180 W/m·K104 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
854 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

290 J/g125 BTU/lb
300 J/g129 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

32 % IACS
28 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in
6.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.44 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.8 V
-0.82 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
52 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
15 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
12%

Weldability

35 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
8 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb
235 MJ/kg101,032 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13.5 kg CO₂/kg
14.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

124 kN·m/kg
122 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

33.8 MN·m/kg
35.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

513 kJ/m³
468 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.8 mm²/s
76.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

31
35

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA356/SiC/20p6061/Al2O3/20p

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability6061/Al2O3/20pA356/SiC/20p
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

6061/Al2O3/20p vs A356/SiC/20p — frequently asked

Is 6061/Al2O3/20p stronger than A356/SiC/20p?

Yes. 6061/Al2O3/20p has a typical tensile strength of 359 MPa (52.1 ksi) against 338 MPa (49 ksi) for A356/SiC/20p — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, 6061/Al2O3/20p or A356/SiC/20p?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 6061/Al2O3/20p or A356/SiC/20p?

6061/Al2O3/20p, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 22/100 against 15/100 for A356/SiC/20p; for welding the order is 6061/Al2O3/20p first (fair, 35/100) then A356/SiC/20p (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6061/Al2O3/20p and A356/SiC/20p side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.