FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 8009/SiC vs A356/SiC/20p

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 8009/SiC and A356/SiC/20p are both aluminum grades. 8009/SiC is the stronger of the two: yield strength 425 MPa (61.6 ksi) against 303 MPa (43.9 ksi) for A356/SiC/20p, about 40% more; tensile strength follows at 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) vs 338 MPa (49 ksi). 8009/SiC is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 0.5% for A356/SiC/20p, and 8009/SiC is harder (150 HB vs 118 HB). A356/SiC/20p is lighter (2.76 g/cm³ vs 2.95 g/cm³ for 8009/SiC) and 8009/SiC runs hotter in service (315°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, A356/SiC/20p welds better (poor vs not recommended).

8009/SiCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

A356/SiC/20pChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when it will be welded.

8009/SiC vs A356/SiC/20p: properties

8009/SiCA356/SiC/20p

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
98 GPa14.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

39 GPa5.7 Msi
38 GPa5.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

83 GPa12 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

500 MPa72.5 ksi
338 MPa49 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

425 MPa61.6 ksi
303 MPa43.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
0.5%

Compressive Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Shear Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

16 MPa·√m14.6 ksi·√in
14 MPa·√m12.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
118 HB

Hardness, Vickers

170 HV
125 HV

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.95 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³
2.76 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

640°C1,184 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

—
613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

125 W/m·K72.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
180 W/m·K104 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

870 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
854 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19.5 µm/m·K10.8 µin/in·°F
17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
300 J/g129 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

315°C599 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 28 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 6.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.44 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.82 V

Corrosion Resistance

42 / 100
52 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

18 / 100
15 / 100

Weldability

12 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

18 / 100
8 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

—
70 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 12%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

320 MJ/kg137,575 BTU/lb
235 MJ/kg101,032 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

24 kg CO₂/kg
14.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,300 L/kg156 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

169 kN·m/kg
122 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

33.9 MN·m/kg
35.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

903 kJ/m³
468 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48.7 mm²/s
76.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

32
35

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA356/SiC/20p8009/SiC

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability8009/SiCA356/SiC/20p
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

8009/SiC vs A356/SiC/20p — frequently asked

Is 8009/SiC stronger than A356/SiC/20p?

Yes. 8009/SiC has a typical yield strength of 425 MPa (61.6 ksi) against 303 MPa (43.9 ksi) for A356/SiC/20p — about 40% more. Tensile strength is 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) vs 338 MPa (49 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 8009/SiC or A356/SiC/20p?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 8009/SiC or A356/SiC/20p?

A356/SiC/20p. Its weldability rates poor (25/100) against not recommended (12/100) for 8009/SiC.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 8009/SiC and A356/SiC/20p side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.