FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6061/Al2O3/20p vs 8009/SiC

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6061/Al2O3/20p and 8009/SiC are both aluminum grades. 8009/SiC is the stronger of the two: yield strength 425 MPa (61.6 ksi) against 317 MPa (46 ksi) for 6061/Al2O3/20p, about 34% more; tensile strength follows at 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) vs 359 MPa (52.1 ksi). 8009/SiC is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 2.5% for 6061/Al2O3/20p, and 8009/SiC is harder (150 HB vs 110 HB). 8009/SiC runs hotter in service (315°C vs 180°C continuous) and 6061/Al2O3/20p conducts heat better (150 W/m·K vs 125 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 6061/Al2O3/20p welds better (fair vs not recommended).

6061/Al2O3/20pChoose it when it will be welded.

8009/SiCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

6061/Al2O3/20p vs 8009/SiC: properties

6061/Al2O3/20p8009/SiC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

98 GPa14.2 Msi
100 GPa14.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

38 GPa5.5 Msi
39 GPa5.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
83 GPa12 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

359 MPa52.1 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

317 MPa46 ksi
425 MPa61.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

2.5%
5%

Reduction in Area

3%
—

Compressive Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Shear Strength

215 MPa31.2 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

140 MPa20.3 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

17 MPa·√m15.5 ksi·√in
16 MPa·√m14.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

110 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

66 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

118 HV
170 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.9 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.95 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

582°C1,080 °F
640°C1,184 °F

Liquidus Temperature

652°C1,206 °F
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

150 W/m·K86.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
125 W/m·K72.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
870 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
19.5 µm/m·K10.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

290 J/g125 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
315°C599 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

32 % IACS
28 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in
6.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.44 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.8 V
-0.78 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
42 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
18 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
12%

Weldability

35 / 100
12 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
18 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb
320 MJ/kg137,575 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13.5 kg CO₂/kg
24 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,300 L/kg156 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

124 kN·m/kg
169 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

33.8 MN·m/kg
33.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

513 kJ/m³
903 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.8 mm²/s
48.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

31
32

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale6061/Al2O3/20p8009/SiC

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability6061/Al2O3/20p8009/SiC
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

6061/Al2O3/20p vs 8009/SiC — frequently asked

Is 8009/SiC stronger than 6061/Al2O3/20p?

Yes. 8009/SiC has a typical yield strength of 425 MPa (61.6 ksi) against 317 MPa (46 ksi) for 6061/Al2O3/20p — about 34% more. Tensile strength is 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) vs 359 MPa (52.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6061/Al2O3/20p or 8009/SiC?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 6061/Al2O3/20p or 8009/SiC?

6061/Al2O3/20p. Its weldability rates fair (35/100) against not recommended (12/100) for 8009/SiC.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6061/Al2O3/20p and 8009/SiC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.