FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5005 vs 5154

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5005 and 5154 are both aluminum grades, both corrosion resistant al. 5154 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for 5005, about 49% more; tensile strength follows at 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) vs 159 MPa (23.1 ksi). 5154 is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 8% for 5005, and 5154 is harder (67 HB vs 41 HB). 5005 runs hotter in service (120°C vs 65°C continuous) and 5005 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 125 W/m·K).

5005Choose it when the part sees heat.

5154Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

5005 vs 5154: properties

50055154

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

68.9 GPa10 Msi
70.3 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

25.9 GPa3.8 Msi
26.4 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

159 MPa23.1 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

138 MPa20 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
15%

Shear Strength

96 MPa13.9 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

41 HB
67 HB

Hardness, Vickers

—
71 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

632°C1,170 °F
593°C1,099 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
643°C1,189 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
125 W/m·K72.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
23.9 µm/m·K13.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
65°C149 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-270°C-454 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

52 % IACS
32 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.3 µΩ·in
5.39×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.12 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.86 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Formability (cold)

72 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

72 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 45 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 35% · Weldability 88 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
102 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

138 kJ/m³
299 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.3 mm²/s
52.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50055154

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50055154
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

5005 vs 5154 — frequently asked

Is 5154 stronger than 5005?

Yes. 5154 has a typical yield strength of 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for 5005 — about 49% more. Tensile strength is 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) vs 159 MPa (23.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5005 or 5154?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose 5005 over 5154?

Pick 5005 when the part sees heat. Pick 5154 when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5005 and 5154 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.