FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5005 vs 5019

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5005 and 5019 are both aluminum grades. 5019 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for 5005, about 67% more; tensile strength follows at 335 MPa (48.6 ksi) vs 159 MPa (23.1 ksi). 5019 is the more ductile: elongation 13% versus 8% for 5005, and 5019 is harder (88 HB vs 41 HB). 5005 runs hotter in service (120°C vs 65°C continuous) and 5005 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 113 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 5005 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5019 (standard, $$).

5005Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

5019Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

5005 vs 5019: properties

50055019

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

68.9 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

25.9 GPa3.8 Msi
26.4 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
68 GPa9.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

159 MPa23.1 ksi
335 MPa48.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

138 MPa20 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
13%

Shear Strength

96 MPa13.9 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

41 HB
88 HB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.64 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

632°C1,170 °F
570°C1,058 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
630°C1,166 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
113 W/m·K65.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
24.2 µm/m·K13.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
65°C149 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

52 % IACS
28 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.3 µΩ·in
6.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.44 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.87 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

88 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

72 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

72 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

—
25 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 45 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 35%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
127 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

138 kJ/m³
378 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.3 mm²/s
47.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
22

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50055019

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50055019
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

5005 vs 5019 — frequently asked

Is 5019 stronger than 5005?

Yes. 5019 has a typical yield strength of 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for 5005 — about 67% more. Tensile strength is 335 MPa (48.6 ksi) vs 159 MPa (23.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5005 or 5019?

5005 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5019 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose 5005 over 5019?

Pick 5005 when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor. Pick 5019 when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5005 and 5019 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.