FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5005 vs 5059

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5005 and 5059 are both aluminum grades. 5059 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for 5005, about 38% more; tensile strength follows at 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) vs 159 MPa (23.1 ksi). 5059 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 8% for 5005, and 5059 is harder (85 HB vs 41 HB). 5005 runs hotter in service (120°C vs 65°C continuous) and 5005 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 115 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 5005 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5059 (premium, $$$).

5005Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

5059Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

5005 vs 5059: properties

50055059

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

68.9 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

25.9 GPa3.8 Msi
26.4 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

159 MPa23.1 ksi
360 MPa52.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

138 MPa20 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
20%

Shear Strength

96 MPa13.9 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

41 HB
85 HB

Compressive Strength

—
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.64 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

632°C1,170 °F
570°C1,058 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
640°C1,184 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
115 W/m·K66.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
23.5 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
65°C149 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

52 % IACS
29 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.3 µΩ·in
6.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.42 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.87 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
42 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
30%

Weldability

88 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

72 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

72 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

—
25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
136 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

138 kJ/m³
258 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.3 mm²/s
48.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50055059

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50055059
Default condition—H111
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

5005 vs 5059 — frequently asked

Is 5059 stronger than 5005?

Yes. 5059 has a typical yield strength of 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for 5005 — about 38% more. Tensile strength is 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) vs 159 MPa (23.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5005 or 5059?

5005 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5059 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose 5005 over 5059?

Pick 5005 when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor. Pick 5059 when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5005 and 5059 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.