FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5005 vs 5083

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5005 and 5083 are both aluminum grades. 5083 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 228 MPa (33.1 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for 5005, about 65% more; tensile strength follows at 317 MPa (46 ksi) vs 159 MPa (23.1 ksi). 5083 is the more ductile: elongation 16% versus 8% for 5005, and 5083 is harder (85 HB vs 41 HB). 5005 runs hotter in service (120°C vs 65°C continuous) and 5005 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 117 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 5005 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5083 (standard, $$).

5005Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

5083Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

5005 vs 5083: properties

50055083

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

68.9 GPa10 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

25.9 GPa3.8 Msi
26.4 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

159 MPa23.1 ksi
317 MPa46 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

138 MPa20 ksi
228 MPa33.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
16%

Shear Strength

96 MPa13.9 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

41 HB
85 HB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
34 MPa·√m30.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

632°C1,170 °F
574°C1,065 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
638°C1,180 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
117 W/m·K67.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
65°C149 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-270°C-454 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

52 % IACS
29 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.3 µΩ·in
5.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.32 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.87 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
30%

Weldability

88 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

72 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

72 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

—
15 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
175 MJ/kg75,237 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
11.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
119 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

138 kJ/m³
366 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.3 mm²/s
48.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
22

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50055083

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50055083
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

5005 vs 5083 — frequently asked

Is 5083 stronger than 5005?

Yes. 5083 has a typical yield strength of 228 MPa (33.1 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for 5005 — about 65% more. Tensile strength is 317 MPa (46 ksi) vs 159 MPa (23.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5005 or 5083?

5005 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5083 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 5005 or 5083?

5083, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 45/100 for 5005.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5005 and 5083 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.