FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5005 vs 5082

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5005 and 5082 are both aluminum grades. 5082 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 159 MPa (23.1 ksi) for 5005, about 73% more. 5082 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 8% for 5005, and 5082 is harder (66 HB vs 41 HB). 5005 runs hotter in service (120°C vs 65°C continuous) and 5005 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 120 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 5005 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5082 (standard, $$).

5005Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

5082Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

5005 vs 5082: properties

50055082

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

68.9 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

25.9 GPa3.8 Msi
26.4 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

159 MPa23.1 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

138 MPa20 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
20%

Shear Strength

96 MPa13.9 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

41 HB
66 HB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
35 MPa·√m31.9 ksi·√in

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.65 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

632°C1,170 °F
577°C1,071 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
638°C1,180 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
120 W/m·K69.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
24.2 µm/m·K13.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
65°C149 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

52 % IACS
29 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.3 µΩ·in
5.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.32 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.87 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
74 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
30%

Formability (cold)

72 / 100
78 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

72 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 45 / 100 · Weldability 88 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
104 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

138 kJ/m³
140 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.3 mm²/s
50.3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 19

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50055082

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50055082
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

5005 vs 5082 — frequently asked

Is 5082 stronger than 5005?

Yes. 5082 has a typical tensile strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 159 MPa (23.1 ksi) for 5005 — about 73% more.

Which is cheaper, 5005 or 5082?

5005 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5082 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose 5005 over 5082?

Pick 5005 when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor. Pick 5082 when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5005 and 5082 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.