FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 4006 vs 4104

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 4006 and 4104 are both aluminum grades. 4006 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for 4104, about 79% more. In exchange, 4104 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 5% for 4006, and 4104 is harder (45 HB vs 42 HB). 4104 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 4006 conducts heat better (185 W/m·K vs 160 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 4006 machines more easily (fair vs poor), 4006 welds better (very good vs fair), and 4006 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 4104 (premium, $$$).

4006Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

4104Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

4006 vs 4104: properties

40064104

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

26 GPa3.8 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

145 MPa21 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
18%

Shear Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

42 HB
45 HB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 55 MPa8 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

630°C1,166 °F
559°C1,038 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
596°C1,105 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

185 W/m·K107 BTU/hr·ft·°F
160 W/m·K92.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
20 µm/m·K11.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

395 J/g170 BTU/lb
450 J/g193 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

46 % IACS
40 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.75×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.48 µΩ·in
4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.75 V
-0.82 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
28 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

60 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
97 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30% · Formability (cold) 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
20%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

54 kN·m/kg
62 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
27.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

113 kJ/m³
34 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

76.1 mm²/s
68.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale40064104

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability40064104
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

4006 vs 4104 — frequently asked

Is 4006 stronger than 4104?

Yes. 4006 has a typical yield strength of 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for 4104 — about 79% more. Tensile strength is 145 MPa (21 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 4006 or 4104?

4006 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 4104 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 4006 or 4104?

4006. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (28/100) for 4104; for welding the order is 4006 first (very good, 78/100) then 4104 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 4006 and 4104 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.