FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 4006 vs 4043

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 4006 and 4043 are both aluminum grades, both heat resistant al. 4043 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for 4006, about 24% more. 4043 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 5% for 4006, and 4043 is harder (50 HB vs 42 HB). 4043 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 120°C continuous) and 4006 conducts heat better (185 W/m·K vs 163 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 4043 welds better (excellent vs very good) and 4006 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 4043 (standard, $$).

4006Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

4043Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

4006 vs 4043: properties

40064043

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

145 MPa21 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
12%

Shear Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

42 HB
50 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 55 MPa8 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

630°C1,166 °F
574°C1,065 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
632°C1,170 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

185 W/m·K107 BTU/hr·ft·°F
163 W/m·K94.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

395 J/g170 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

46 % IACS
42 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.75×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.48 µΩ·in
4.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.61 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.75 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
95 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

60 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

54 kN·m/kg
67 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

113 kJ/m³
104 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

76.1 mm²/s
67.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
19

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale40064043

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability40064043
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
DLC—Yes

Both are offered for Sheet metal. They share 15 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating, PTFE Coating and 3 more.

4006 vs 4043 — frequently asked

Is 4043 stronger than 4006?

Yes. 4043 has a typical tensile strength of 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for 4006 — about 24% more.

Which is cheaper, 4006 or 4043?

4006 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 4043 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 4006 or 4043?

4006. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (30/100) for 4043; for welding the order is 4043 first (excellent, 95/100) then 4006 (very good, 78/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 4006 and 4043 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.