FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 4006 vs 4643

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 4006 and 4643 are both aluminum grades, both heat resistant al. 4006 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for 4643, about 79% more. In exchange, 4643 is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 5% for 4006, and 4643 is harder (45 HB vs 42 HB). 4643 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 4006 conducts heat better (185 W/m·K vs 160 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 4643 welds better (excellent vs very good) and 4006 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 4643 (standard, $$).

4006Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

4643Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

4006 vs 4643: properties

40064643

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

145 MPa21 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
15%

Shear Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

55 MPa8 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

42 HB
45 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.69 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

630°C1,166 °F
574°C1,065 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
632°C1,170 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

185 W/m·K107 BTU/hr·ft·°F
160 W/m·K92.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

395 J/g170 BTU/lb
400 J/g172 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

46 % IACS
41 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.75×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.48 µΩ·in
4.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.65 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.75 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
35%

Weldability

78 / 100
96 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
72 / 100

Castability

60 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
20%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

54 kN·m/kg
61 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

113 kJ/m³
36 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

76.1 mm²/s
67.6 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale40064643

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability40064643
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
DLC—Yes

Both are offered for Sheet metal. They share 15 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating, PTFE Coating and 3 more.

4006 vs 4643 — frequently asked

Is 4006 stronger than 4643?

Yes. 4006 has a typical yield strength of 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for 4643 — about 79% more. Tensile strength is 145 MPa (21 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 4006 or 4643?

4006 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 4643 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 4006 or 4643?

4643. Its weldability rates excellent (96/100) against very good (78/100) for 4006.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 4006 and 4643 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.